Wikipedia is now officially a super dirty porn site!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva

 

you don’t have to understand english at all, just look at those dirty pictures they posted on the site.  Posting one picture is fine, do they really have to show you so many different pictures of the same thing so many times, shaved, with pubic hair, even with a picture of when a woman was sexually aroused?!

parents, do you want your children to look at dirty pictures like that? ! If your children are not allowed to watch R rated movies, why should they be given the freedom to look at those dirty pictures which R rated movies won’t even show? It is about time for all public schools to ban dirty porn sites like this!

Wikipedia is going downhill, this is the reality now!

According to the September 28th of 2009 Time magazine, wikipedia has reached its 820,000 user in March of 2007, it has never peaked that record ever again. That is more than two years ago!

Now it is the reality. That article was being nice, it didn’t go anything deep other than the things wikipedia OCD people confirmed.

Less than 15% of the editors are actually women, and it is no wonder wikipedia attracts so many OCD nerds working for it free of charge. Nerds can’t get women in real life, and they can’t get any online, either. That is why they like wikipedia so much, because on that site, they don’t have to be concerned about what women might think of that, they can just do whatever their impulses tell them to do.  That is why there are so many wikipedia administrators that are totally OCD patients! They can’t help it, they like to piss off people. They can’t do it in real life, but online, they don’t have to fear any consequences. They can stalk anyone who is trying to edit wikipedia.

Even the wikipedia management people admit that it has created bureaucracy, so people don’t get motivated to edit those articles any more. Touche, all the serious editors already knew that long time ago, they got harassed by all the OCD wikipedia administrators, so they don’t want to waste their time any more for a useless site any more!

Where are the “dilligent” OCD administrators when they are needed the most?

PC world just published a new article, “The 15 Biggest Wikipedia Blunders” .

If you ever pissed off one of those OCD wikipedia administrators, they will literally follow you like typical cyber stalkers. anything you do on wikipedia will be reverted. no matter if you are correct or not. They “devote” all their free time to piss off regular wikipedia editors, no wonder they were not able to catch any of the following blunders. Because their sole purpose is to piss off as many people as they can, they certainly don’t have time to catch the real mistakes.

For more information, just click on the following link.

http://tech.msn.com/products/articlepcw.aspx?cp-documentid=21535424&gt1=40000

1. Robbie Williams eats domestic pets in pubs for money.
2. David Beckham was a Chinese goalkeeper in the 18th century.
3. Paul Reiser is dead.
4. Sinbad is dead.
5. Sergey Brin is sexy, dating Jimmy Wales and dead.
6. Former British prime minister – Tony Blair worships Hitler.
7. The Duchess of Cornwall’s Christian name is Cow-miller.
8. The University of Cincinnati’s former president is a whore.
9. Robert Byrd is dead.
10. Ted Kennedy died in January.
11. John Seigenthaler helped assassinate John and Robert Kennedy.
12. A yacht killed British TV presenter Vernon Kay.
13. Conan O’Brien assaults sea turtles while canoeing.
14. British TV gardener Alan Titchmarsh published a new version of the Kama Sutra.
15. Sienna Miller has modeled nude.

Wikipedia, the best free pron site ever!

So do you know what an anal ring is? And can you google it and find some pictures of that?

No, you can’t. But don’t worry, wikipedia is here to help, as I have told you guys before, wikipedia is the best free porn site ever.

Children and teenagers can use wikipedia as freely as they want. And parents are never worried about them using wikipedia, right? After all, it claims that it is an online encyclopedia, that sounds so serious already.

Anyway, back to my topic. Here is the a link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guiche_piercing

Now you know. It even has a real person picture on it. And who is that person, well, he is just one of the nice wikipedia contributor. He did it free of charge. So parents, do you really want your children looking at pictures like that on wikipedia?

So it seems that wikipedia just forgot to tell everyone that it is the best sex encyclopedia ever!

Why does wikipedia block many proxy server IP addresses?

There are many users all over the world who have to use proxy server in order to get on some web sites, because their own governments have blocked some of the web site access. For those of you who don’t know, IP address is like your personal phone number. Every time, you get on that web site, if you don’t use a user name, whenever you edit some articles, your IP address will be recorded.

We all know wikipedia are run by some no-life losers in real life, who just have too much free time in their hands, who can spend hours on that site to piss off, stalk, thereten some good editors. Wikipedia claims that anyone can edit anything. Is that right?

Well, they constantly blocking people’s IP addresses. Once that IP is blocked, it will depends on the OCD wikipedia administrator’s moods, they might unblock the IP later, or block it forever. If that IP is blocked, then no one uses that IP address can  edit any more articles.

Then what is the case of making false claims that “anyone can edit wikipedia?” Because only those who haven’t pissed off those OCD wikipedia administors can edit any articles. No matter how good your knowledge is, once your IP address is block, you can’t never edit again.

And they don’t have to go through some investigations or anything similar, a single OCD administrator can practically block any IP addresses s/he doesn’t like. Even if s/he himself might be on drugs, drunk, or anything which may cause his/her unstable emotions, if s/he doesn’t like you, s/he can block you. So even if you are an expert on that article, you just can’t edit.

For those who live in those countries who have to use proxy server in order to get on some web sites, they can’t edit wikipedia. Wikipedia people are so paranoid, they have blocked so many IP addresses, anyone who uses a proxy server can’t edit any articles because their IP addresses are all blocked by wikipedia’s OCD administrators.

In conclusion, wikipedia, don’t lie to the world, you don’t even follow your own rules!

why are the wikipedia administrators all annoymous and so shady?

How the Wikipedia reputation engine works and why Wikipedia should not allow anonymous edits

http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/02/how_the_wikiped.html

This is an interesting article.

“A lot of people think of Wikipedia as being 10 million people, each adding one sentence,” Mr. Wales said. “But really the vast majority of work is done by this small core community.”

New York Times wrote: “The bulk of the writing and editing on Wikipedia is done by a geographically diffuse group of 1,000 or so regulars, many of whom are administrators on the site.”

According to this article, “these people are NOT experts in any field(or they don’t have to be). They DO have to be experts on understanding and enforcing Wikipedia policy.”

Oh, no wonder, now we know why sometimes the things you wrote in those articles were reverted or deleted by those administrators. Some of them have several accounts which wikipedia encourages that. So they can edit an article with one name, and after you made some change to the same article, the administrators will immediately go back and sign in with their administrator user name, and revert your new change.

And who are those administrators? You don’t really know other than their user name. What kind of education do they have? If they are doing such great works for the “humanity,” should they feel proud to tell us their real names? No, they can’t, because what they are doing are not really that glorious.

Wikipedia announced: Ted Kennedy died. Wikipedia’s reputation is going downhill by the minute.

I have stopped “editing” the stupid wikipedia for a long time now. After all, would you waste your time arguing with some lowlife on the street? If you don’t do that in real life, why should you waste your time arguing with some uneducated lowlife administrators on wikipedia?

If wikipedia is so wonderful, I wonder how come I haven’t heard any “great” news about that site any more. So I did a little search online.

Here is an article from The Guardian, Tuesday 27 January 2009 “Wikipedia editors may approve all changes”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jan/27/wikipedia-may-approve-all-changes

“On the day of Barack Obama’s inauguration, the site reported the deaths of West Virginia’s Robert Byrd – the longest-serving senator in American history – and Ted Kennedy….”

Now isn’t that wonderful, we know sooner or later, those two people will die. However, Wikipedia is able to predict the future, and they chose that particular day when those two shall die. Fortunately, they didn’t die as wikipedia wished. Where are the wonderful wikipedia administrators, we know that they spend almost every free minute on there, how come they didn’t catch those two big mistakes? Oh, we forgot. Those administrators don’t have a life, so they don’t have time to watch TV or listen to radio. Their sole purpose is to revert and revert, try to piss off as many editors as possible. They don’t really care if the content is correct or wrong as long as it seems to be right.

Jake Wartenberg commented “A lot of editors are becoming disenchanted with the project; we are losing them all the time.”

Co-founder Jimmy Wales finally suggested that “many future changes to the site would need to be approved by a group of editors before going live.” Now where are they going to find those educated editors to approve those future changes? After all, well educated people don’t have time to sit in front of the computer and wait and approve those new changes in all those articles. Only people who have no life can spend hours and hours on there.

What will those uneducated administrators do from now on, they certainly don’t have the knowledge to know if a new change in an article is correct or wrong. If they can’t get on wikiedpia, revert and revert, they won’t be able to get the almost drug-like high. Many of them stay up all night on that site, who knows what kind of things they use to keep themselves awake all night long. mmm.

Wikipedia should be banned on all public computers.

1. It has way too many dirty pornography materials and photos. Children can read articles about any kinds of pornography articles, actors, etc; and click on those pictures easily from any public computers. Parents can set password on their own TVs, but parents and schools can’t control what children want to read on wikipedia, because they just assumed that wikipedia is actually a “clean” encyclopedia. If those pictures can’t be shown in public, then they are not suitable for Children. Therefore, wikipedia should be banned from public school computers.

2. It has too many errors. A child can edit any articles on there as long as the edition sounds reasonable. And there are highly scientific articles which are rarely checked by any experts. Therefore, a mistake can be taken for real fact, which will not help the readers at all. And those OCD wikipedia editors who have no job in real life obviously don’t have the knowledge to tell which is wrong, which is correct.

Most public libraries already have enough printed encyclopedia and books on many subjects, they don’t need wikipedia. Some of the libraries even have paid account on some serious real online encyclopedia, such as britannica.

3. wikipedia creates obsession compulsive disorder! That is the fact, just look at those wikipedia editors, the first thing after they wake up in the morning is to check wikipedia, the last thing they do before bed is to check wikipedia. The world is not a perfect place, if those idiots can spend more than 8 hours a day on wikipedia, why can’t they go out of their homes, use that time to volunteer, and change someone’s life for real. Those OCD editors just love to exasperate people by reverting and reverting people’s editions. Some of them probably don’t even pay for their internet, they just go to public libraries and use them to annoy those real experts who are trying to help to improve wikipedia.

wikipedia is a web site which is ran by creepy cyber stalkers!

just look at this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse

they have everything. How many of those people listed on that page are real life criminals? However, this creepy wikipedia has everything of what a typical stalker does on the internet.

Those OCD administrators constantly put this on someone’s personal user page:”An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of..” In real life, can someone paint someone’s house with “a neighbor has expressed a concern that this person may be a gang member of ..?” No one can do that in real life, but on this creepy wikipedia site, OCD administrators can do whatever they want, they can delete some user’s front page entirely, and just put that on that person’s page.

Another example:”This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that they have used one or more accounts abusively..” Can you put someone in jail just because you suspect something, but that is what they are doing on wikipedia daily. Wikipedia has no laws, as long as you are the OCD administrators, you can make up laws daily.

On wikipedia, those psychotic administrators always assume that “I suspect, therefore you must be guilty of something.”

They even have a “counter vandalism unit” on wikipedia as if they are some kind heroic law agent!

This is getting really creepy just to think about it. Those no-life OCD administrators not only spend all their time on there pissing people off, but they are also stalking people on the internet! They are all real life stalkers! yes, that is right. They create “personal pages” for anyone they don’t like, and they name those pages as “long term abuse”, it is more like long term stalking by the OCD wikipedian administrators. On those personal pages, they have: original names, time span, ISP provider, known IPs,severity, etc. They know who those users are, what they like or dislike, their preferences,etc.

The creepiest part about it is that they even have “physical location” listed on those personal pages, sometimes, the person’s real names are also listed!

Are those banned users “hackers” or “criminals against humanity?” Did they do any harm to the society? certainly not!

Who give wikipedia the rights to expose people’s real names, and physical locations on the internet!? What are they going to do with those physical locations and names? Are they going to send some OCD administrators and stalk them in real life?! Why do they want to list someone’s real name on the internet, so they can recruit more stalkers to stalk those innocent people?!

And they even have “instructions” for future wikipedia stalkers, for example, here is one:”Revert all edits, speedy delete new articles, obtain immediate admin assistance to block sockpuppet account and monitor for numerous subsequent sockpuppets. Consider semi-protecting any articles targeted.”

Now not only they are stalking people online, they also like to vandalize wikipedia pages by “reverting all edits.” Is that what a normal sane person would do? Why do you want to revert all edits if you don’t even know if it is correct or not? Why do they want to delete all new articles, what if the new article is actually correct? Who are the people that are really vandalizing wikipedia? It is quite obvious that the psychotic OCD administrators are the ones who are vandalizing wikipedia every minute. And that is the reason why no one is using wikipedia for reference any more.

Indeed, wikipedia is becoming a haven for real life stalkers, they now have a perfect web site to express their stalking activities freely.

psychotic OCD wikipedia administrators, Stop stalking people on the internet before the police send you to the real jails!

Wikipedia is ran by bunch of clueless clowns.

I often wonder if wikipedia is ran by mentally challenged people? This one is proven to be true. Here is a perfect example.

let’s look at this OCD wikipedia administrator, “Can’t sleep, clown will eat me”, yes, that is his/her real user name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Can’t_sleep%2C_clown_will_eat_me

A clown picture was posted, it is probably himself/herself. Under the picture, it has “AHHHH IT’S GOING TO EEEAAAAT MEEE!!!!!! “

Will any serious encyclopedia company ever hire a ridiculous clown looking like a clown to be their administrator or editor? Can this person dress like a clown if he works for microsoft or google? Certainly not. So you know the quality wikipedia has.

Check out all those ridiculous wikipedia stars s/he got. It seems that wikipedia’s mentality is really only at elementary school level, those OCD administrators constantly give each other stars as if they are still in elementary schools. Wikipedia itself is a giant elementary school while obsessed with pornography.

check out those ridiculous names of those stars this clown has got.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar (meaning: pissed off lots of good editors by reverting their good contributions)
The Working Man’s Barnstar (meaning: people who are not working in real life who spend all their time as jobless wikipedia administrators)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (meaning: obsessed with wikipedia, with no real life job, spent most of free time on here)
The Barnstar of Good Humor (Is wikipedia a comedy club? now we know why we can’t take it seriously.)
The Surreal Barnstar (meaning: they spend nighttime on wikipedia as daytime, and daytime for sleeping.)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar (meaning: adamantly refuse to seek counseling for wikipedia generated OCD)
The Purple Star
The Original Barnstar
The Barnstar of Diligence
The Excellent Userpage Award
The Special Barnstar

They obviously have no imaginiation, that is why they ran out of names, that is why they have to name two stars as “original barnstar” and “special barnstar”.

So next time, when you see someone has some stars on his/her page, that means s/he is addicted. S/he must have spent a lot of time working as OCD administrators, and has pissed a lot of real editors in order to get those meaningless stars.