wikipedia is a good source for free pornography, there is no age limit, children are welcome

a while ago, i told you that wikipedia has lots of penis pictures. of course, i have to check out their vagina article. apprently, a lot of “active” editors really like to edit this article, so those OCD administrators decided to lock that article, so regular people can only read, but can’t edit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina

anway, most real encyclopedia will only have a hand drawn picture of the vagina, but wikipedia actually has a real big size vagina picture named with scientific names. thanks to that annoymous woman who decided to expose her most private part for the whole world to see. Not only that, since wikipedia is a free site, any kids who know how to spell the word pussy vagina, who know how to use a mouse, can read that article even in their own school library.

yea, how many kids or teenagers will actually look at that article because they want to find out some scientific facts about vagina? I doubt that

Not only that, be sure to check the article for mons pubis, it has a side view real life colored picture of a female’s vagina, we don’t know if that is from the same “brave” woman or not. you can see the public hair on the vagina distinctively

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mons_pubis

Then be sure to check out the “cleft” picture, a shaved vagina, hey, who doesn’t like variety. I am sure that any parents will be happy to know that their teenage sons are studying the online encyclopedia, and they will be happy know that their sons will know the difference between a shaved and un-shaved vagina

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cleft.jpg

Even if parents block some pornography sites on the internet, now their sons and daughters can look at free pornography pictures on the so-called online “encyclopedia” where anyone can submit their vagina and penis, who knows what else perverts have submitted pictures and be “worshiped” by fans across the world, how great is that?

Movie theaters check IDs if someone wants to watch a R rated movie. When teenagers turn on TV without adult channels, will they ever be able to see a naked penis or a vagina picture? No, never. Thanks to free wikipedia, teens, boys and girls don’t have to show their IDs if they just want to look at dirty pics on wikipedia. And please, don’t tell us that those pics are merely “erotic”, or just for scientific reasons. And you know it very well, what horny teenagers do when they get online, sex is always on their mind. A naked picture is a dirty picture, they don’t care to read “articles” on wikipedia, they just want to find out more and more free dirty pics. And did you also know that wikipedia has tons of articles about all kinds of porn stars, straight, gay, just enter the porn star’s name, you are almost guaranteed to find the article.

Even for those who don’t have Internet at home, they can just go to any local libraries and check out free porns on wikipedia. It is just that easy!

Thanks to wikipedia, now all the horny teenagers can have a free, uncensored free pornography site.

PS: some think that those dirty pictures are not “pornography”. well, can you find any of those pictures in any non-pornography magzines or newspapers? Can you ask your local TV stations to show any of those pictures even after midnight? Can you ask your local high schools to post any of those pictures on campus, or use those pictures as sex education materials?!

I don’t think so.

wikipedia is creating more internet addiction and OCD editors and administrators.

it is very easy to find “editors” and administraotrs on wikipedia that spend hours and hours on that site. normally, if someone spends too many hours on a site, s/he will realize that it is not healthy for him/her. however, on the wikipedia site, those people actually feel good the longer they stay on that site, because they feel that they are making this world a better place by “editing” an “encyclopedia,” for the OCD and wikipedia addicted administrators, they feel good by spending long hours on that site reverting “vandalism” (also known to themselves as anything that they don’t like.)

wikipedia knows for a fact that that site is creating more OCD and addiction patients each and everyday. however, they are not doing anything about it.

they should copy from answers.yahoo.com. today it was my first day answering questions on yahoo answers. so i started answering lots of questions. and all of sudden, i got this notice that I have answered my daily limit, therefore, i can no longer answer any more questions. that function was set probably because yahoo also realized that there are some yahoo users who just spend too many hours on answering questions.

so if yahoo can set its daily limit for its users general health, how come wikipedia can’t? we can only image what those OCD and wikipedia addicted administrators will do if they are only allowed one hour every day to piss other people off. they would go crazy. maybe that is the reason why wikipedia does not have a time limit for its administrators. because they know many of the wikipedia administrators have OCD and addiction, after all, wikipedia gets to expand at the cost of those nerdy administrators’ personal lives. wikipedia may get better, but those administrators’ symptoms and signs are only getting worse.

Chinese version Wikipedia is blocked in China, but how can 30 Chinese administrators still be able to manage the site from China?

Wikipedia’s Chinese version is blocked by the Chinese government, however, 30 Chinese who are working directly inside China are able to get on this government blocked site, and manage it as “volunteers.”

That just makes everyone wonder, how can those “brave” people dare to challenge their own government’s action? why are they so “defiant?” At the same time, the rest of over one billion Chinese are blocked from using that site? mmm.

There are six people working directly from Beijing, the capital city-. Chinese government constantly blocks and closes web sites. Doesn’t it make you wonder? How come those people working right inside the government’s capital? Wikipedia is already blocked, why can’t those 30 Chinese working freely as if the government’s block doesn’t exist?

If they can bypass the government’s block so easily, why do the rest of the over 1 billion Chinese have problems of connecting to wikipedia? Ask yourself, if you are working for a site that is blocked by your own government, would you be worried? And don’t you think that police maybe listening to your conversations on the phone, checking your internet activity online?

If someone is able to get to wikipedia so easily everyday, won’t the Chinese government itself get suspicious? And maybe even send a police or two to check out who that guy is? chinese government has a very tight control over the internet. It is not news any more that chinese government have put someone in jail simply because what they wrote on a web site.

why do those 30 people have the priviledges of getting connected to wikipedia? Wikipedia people certainly know who those 30 people are. Why can’t wikipedia ask those 30 people to share their “secrets” on getting connected to wikipedia, so millions and millions of Chinese can get wikipedia freely. Why doesn’t wikipedia do that?

This just doesn’t make sense, they have 30 Chinese managing a site that billions of Chinese can’t read, what is the whole purpose of doing that? The only conclusion is that those 30 people must be working for the chinese government, or at least, they have been informed by the government to write only good things about the chinese government on wikipedia.

Then when you go read the Chinese wikipedia on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Wikipedia

It is entirely written by those Chinese administrators themselves. And how can the wikipedia calls itself neutral?!

When people try to add the truth to that article, they are immediately blocked by wikipedia Obsessive-compulsive disorder administrators.

Those OCD patients even delete people’s comments on discussion page.

wikipedia simply can’t handle the truth, they don’t want people to know the truth, either. No one can trust wikipedia at all.

Another typical OCD, internet addiction wikipedia “editor” AuburnPilot exposed.

This is so easy. Just pick a random wikipedia “editor,” check out his or her’s daily “contribution,” you will be amazed how many hours they spend on that site.

Here is another one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=AuburnPilot

user name: auburnpilot.

he started on May 9th, 2007
03:20 – 07:05

about 3 hours and 45 minutes

then once again, he is back on
14:43 – 16:54

about 2 hours 11 minutes

again

20:48 – 22:14

about 1 hour 26 minutes

He spent total of 7 hours and 24 minutes in just ONE single day!

Once again, does this person have a real life job? does this person have a social life? Are those editors all nerds, social rejects, so they can only get on wikipedia to waste their entire life away? That is just pathetic. Get a life.

Wikipedia administrator is a typical pizza delivery driver Grandmasterka . That tells us the quality of that pathetic encyclopedia.

Would microsoft, google ever hire a pizza delivery man to work on any of their web sites? Would any serious web site companies hire a pizza delivery man to manage any of their sites? Would any of the real encyclopedia company hire someone like that who has no education to write any of their articles? In real life, this person is a nobody, but online, he is transformed into someone important who doesn’t even have a good education.

Well, wikipedia is not like them at all. It doesn’t matter if you have zero education, wikipedia welcomes all. That is the “wikipedia dream.” As long as you have obsessive compuslive disorder, and you have no social life, and wikipedia is your one and only lifetime devotion, you will be the administrator! It is just that easy. Here is the perfect example of someone who has no education who finally made it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grandmasterka

According to his site when I first wrote this, he is a person born in October 4th, 1985, who just recently turned 21,  who is “a pizza delivery driver” for an “international” corporation. Does that make him an important person because it is an “international” pizza delivery company?

Conspicuously, he did not go to or was not able to finish college. And we can also conclude that he is clearly not intelligent enough to find a better job. However, he is already an editor of the “encyclopedia” which welcomes anyone who knows how to type to become editors.

Because he is an editor on that site, therefore he was able to make a future article on himself “Linden Killam.” And there is already an article about his “borderline-notable” band – “The blend.” Do you think that the

He admits himself that he is “thoroughly obsessed with wikipedia.”

He also told the world that he is “an extreme night owl,” he is on that site “very early in the morning in central time.” That means he basically have no social life during daytime. He gets online only when most people are sleeping, he sleeps when most people are out there having fun social activities.

Recently, he found his camera again, so he hopes “to get more involved in the image side of things.” yes, people, would you like to see some free pictures taken by a pizza delivery driver? So you know the reason why wikipedia’s quality is so low now.

In conclusion, let’s quote what he has on his own page:”This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.”

Next time, be sure to ask your pizza delivery man “are you an editor of wikipedia? Thank you for all your hard work, here is a buck.”

Update:  So it seems that this OCD patient finally made himself an OCD administrator after thousands and thousands of free hours that he has wasted on that site. According to his current page, he is still a pizza delivery man. And he has made over 9,000 contributions. He is 22 years old, and we have to wonder how many hours he must have spent on wikipedia in order to make that over 9000 contributions? He is truly addicted to Internet and wikipedia.

He “used to be a broadcaster,” have you ever seen anyone under 22 working as a broadcaster? He plays piano and saxophone, and he also calls himself a “music composer.” Oh, really, if he is such a musical genius, why is he still delivering pizza for a living?

Finally, at the bottom of his page, he admits “This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.”

yea, like we didn’t know already, that is pratically what every OCD administrators on wikipedia are doing!

Pizzaboy, you can continue deliever your pizzas, and we simply can’t read any articles that you have edited.

a typical wikipedia genereated obsessive-compulsive disorder,wikipedia addicted patient’s daily activity.

here is a typical wikipedia addiction patient’s “contribution” log.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&target=Dynaflow 

This OCD patient signed on wikipedia May 5th, 2007 from 03:22, ended on 05:49, (about 3 hours and 27 mins) then took a break, then s/he was back on again at 09:09, then offline again at 12:06, (another 3 hours) then came back on 17:38, finally got off on 19:58, (another 2 hours and 20 mins).

This obsessive-compulsive disorder patient obviously have wikipedia addiction, in that single random day of May 5th, s/he spent a total of 8 hours and 47 minutes on it!

what was s/he doing on there? he spent almost all his/her time on deleting “spams,” reverting “vandalism.”

It is also evident that s/he must have another account to do editing, so that he can avoid other people who are pissed off at what s/he reverted to revert what s/he edited. In case you don’t know, that is a common knowledge that wikipedia also creates multiple personality disorders, many people on there have multiple accounts for different purposes.

Does s/he have a life, have a job?! S/he obviously don’t have any friends or social life. Is s/he on welfare? So we are paying tax to the government, so this person can get on that addiction site and piss other people off?!

Is that site really helping people or destorying people’s lives?! That patient clearly needs help to overcome his/her internet addiction, and his compulsive disorder.

Wikipedia refues to admit that it is creating more OCD patients.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:HOLIC

Wikipedia:Wikipediholic

“This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any remotely serious purpose.”

check that out, they claim that it is not for “any remotely serious purpose.”

hello, why do they still want to hide their heads in their butts? There are so many wikipedia administrators that have obsessive compulsive disorders on there, they have no real jobs. They are on that site 24/7. They spend most of their time reverting “vandalism” which are the things that they don’t like personally.

If they are really doing a “good” job, how come there are so many false, fake biographies on that site, and how come many colleges now prohibit their students to quote from that shitty site?

It just amazes me that so many administrators obviously have no social life. And more and more OCD patients are becoming wikipedia administrators. They become administrators not by editing articles, most of them become administrators by reverting “vandalism.” They should just stop calling the site as the free “encyclopedia,” they should call it free “vandalism.”

Obviously, those OCD patients who are running that site get a natural high by reverting editions, and banning people.

They are all OCD nerds in real life, on that site, they can finally live a life as if they are all heros. duh. get a life already, go find a real hobby, losers.