another wikipedia OCD administrator exposed

June 26, 2007

Gogo Dodo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gogo_Dodo 

It simply amazes me how many OCD administrators wikipedia has!

look at this person, s/he clearly has wikipedia addiction, and has OCD, most likely a male who has no job, no social life, therefore, he can spend all his lifetime on wikipedia.

for example,

he started on June 25th, 2007 at 06:20 – 06:47, then he got back on again at 16:40, and he ended his last message at 23:06.

that is about total of SEVEN HOURS he spent on that site alone! he is just another typical jobless, no life wikipedia obsessed OCD administrator.

sure, wikipedia is not paying him even a single penny for anything he does on there, however, for a person like him who has no job, how much is our welfare system paying for him to live like a bum? In the end, even if he just gets a job at mcdonald, at least, he is doing something good for the society. Seriously, how many people will ever read anything he wrote on there for a person like him who certainly didn’t have any good education.

Indeed, wikipedia is destroying many people’s lives one at a time!


wikipedia wants you to look at people’s pubic hair pictures!

June 18, 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pubic_hair

ya, do you know what “pubic hair” means? well, don’t worry, just click on that link, you will understand the meaning of pubic hair! And if you can’t understand it, you can look at those free real pubic hair pictures, including a black male and a white female’s uncovered NAKED genital pictures shown their pubic hair.

yea, parents, don’t worry about your little children reading articles on wikipedia, wikipedia is children friendly, anyone can read that pubic hair article with no problem at all.

wikipedia, the free porn site, free for all!


wikipedia is indeed a free and popular pornographic encyclopedia

June 18, 2007

wikipedia is indeed an free pornographic encyclopedia, it has so many biographies of many porn stars, it even have an article on “pornographic actor”, the history, actors, pay rates, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographic_actress

Yea, parents, if you want your children to be a porn star, wikipedia is the good place to start, it is free, and your children can browse all the dirty porno information even in the local libriries through wikipedia.

so there is no need to worry if your children are using wikipedia at all, wikipedia is safe for little children, free porno information for everyone.

here is one example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christy_Canyon

a pornography actress


“Wikipedia blocked in China” the original uncensored article.

June 4, 2007

While the entire wikipedia is blocked by the Chinese government, wikipedia itself also deleted many important information about the blockage, it seems that China and wikipedia are working together.

here is the original uncensored article which wikipedia administrators do not want the world to know the truth.

————–

On several occasions, the government and [[Internet service provider]]s of the [[People's Republic of China]] (PRC) have blocked [[Wikipedia]] in [[mainland China]] due to [[Internet censorship in mainland China|strict censorship laws]] enacted by the PRC.

The blocks function in a similar way to a [[content filter]]. As with [[Internet censorship in mainland China|Internet censorship in the PRC]] in general, the territories of [[Hong Kong]] and [[Macau]], which have separate legal systems, are not affected. Wikimedia sites have been blocked at least three times in their history.

In April 2006, Chinese [[search engine]] company [[Baidu]] launched [[Baidu Baike]], a [[wiki]]-like [[Chinese language]] online encyclopedia, based in [[mainland China]]. Baidu Baike’s content policies differ from those of Wikipedia,<ref>{{zh icon}} {{cite web| url=http://www.baidu.com/search/baike_help.html#n7| title=百科原则| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=Baidu Baike}}</ref> and the site has not been subject to blocking. The encyclopedia contains more articles than all language editions of Wikipedia besides the English version.

In June 2007, the block was lifted except for the Chinese version of Wikipedia and a select number of articles (including [[Falun Gong]] and [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]]) which remain inaccessible to users in China.

==Blocks==
===First block===
The first block spanned [[June 2]] and [[June 21]], [[2004]]. It began when access to the [[Chinese Wikipedia]] from [[Beijing]] was blocked on the 15th anniversary of the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]].

Possibly related to this occurrence, on [[May 31]] an article from the IDG News Service was published,<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,116323,00.asp| title=Chinese Build Free Net Encyclopedia| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=PC WORLD}}</ref> discussing the Chinese Wikipedia’s treatment of the protests. The Chinese Wikipedia also has articles on various topics considered controversial within China, such as [[Taiwan independence]], written by contributors from Taiwan and elsewhere, [[Falun Gong]], the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]], and so on. A few days after the initial block of Chinese Wikipedia, all [[Wikimedia]] sites were blocked in mainland China.

In response to the blocks, two [[sysop]]s on the Chinese Wikipedia, ‘Shizhao’ and ‘Mountain’, contacted their respective ISPs, and confirmed that the Wikimedia sites had been blocked. Shizhao’s ISP, China Science & Technology Net, expressed willingness to submit an appeal to lift the block. Shizhao and Mountain then drafted an appeal, which was submitted on [[June 15]], 2004. The appeal stated that Wikipedia was an encyclopedia that does not serve any political bias, strives to be neutral, and provides an avenue for foreigners to understand [[China]] and [[Chinese culture]]. The appeal also compared the Chinese Wikipedia’s coverage of controversial topics to coverage in existing encyclopedias in China, and suggested that the blocking of Wikipedia would prevent sysops from removing undesirable content. All the Wikimedia sites were unblocked between [[June 17]] and [[June 21]], [[2004]].

There was no explanation for the block, either before or after its occurrence. The block had an effect on the vitality of Chinese Wikipedia, which suffered sharp dips in various indicators such as the number of new users, the number of new articles, and the number of edits. In some cases, it took anywhere from 6 to 12 months in order for these to return to their levels of May 2004.

===Second block===
The second and less serious block lasted between [[September 23]] and [[September 27]], [[2004]]. During this 4-day period, access to Wikipedia was erratic or unavailable to some users in mainland China — this block was not comprehensive and some users in mainland China were never affected. The exact reason for the block was unknown, but it may have been linked with the closing down of [[YTHT BBS]], a popular [[Peking University]]-based BBS that was shut down a few weeks earlier for hosting overtly radical political discussions. Former users from the BBS had arrived en masse on Chinese Wikipedia. Chinese Wikipedians once again prepared a written appeal to regional ISPs, but the block was lifted before the appeal was actually sent out.

===Third block===
The third block began on [[19 October]] [[2005]]. Nearly a year later on [[10 October]] [[2006]], the block was partially lifted.

In response to the block, the [[:zh:|main page]] of the Chinese Wikipedia has added a message at the top directing any mainland China user who succeeds in getting through to a special [[:zh:Wikipedia talk:状况回报|status page]]. Dozens of editors from across [[mainland China]] have reported on the status page that they can only access Wikipedia using [[proxy servers]].

On [[21 October]] 2005, ‘Shizhao’ once again submitted an appeal to his ISP, and stated, “”If nothing goes wrong, the block should be lifted within one week.”” On [[October 24]], Shizhao posted, “”The block will be lifted by Wednesday [''[[October 26]]”]. According to procedure (the details of which are unknown), after the appeal is submitted, a reply will come within 3 business days, and my appeal has already been submitted by the ISP on Friday. My ISP has said that so far they haven’t encountered a case where an appeal has failed. This should be good news, but it’s still impossible to know the reason for the block.””

The appeal submitted strove to be closer to the position of the Chinese government than the first appeal submitted in 2004. It stated, “”… [t]he most effective approach is not to reject [this project] outside our borders, but to participate in it actively. If we block Wikipedia, we lose the opportunity to speak with the world with a Chinese voice, and allow forces such as evil cults and Taiwan independence [to] control the development of content in the project, thus presenting to the world a twisted [image of] China; as users, we lose a channel through which we could access knowledge, a channel whose importance is rising constantly; such an act [i.e. blocking] is no different from cutting away our own voice and tongue, or shutting our own eyes and ears; it is closing the doors to our country in the age of the internet.”” ([[:zh:Wikipedia:应对封禁/申告材料2|~Original text~]])

In the morning of [[31 October]] [[2005]], [[Chinese Standard Time]] (UTC +8), Wikipedians from all parts of mainland China began to report that they could access Wikipedia without using proxies. It was initially thought that the block had indeed been lifted, but later on the apparent “unblocking” was linked to the deployment of an [[LVS load balancer]] in front of the [[squid cache|squid]] in the Korean [[server cluster]], which changed the [[IP address]] of Wikimedia sites for users in China, thus circumventing the block. In any case, within a few hours normal access to Wikipedia was once again impossible.

There has been some discussion that a self-censored version could be made available to users in mainland China, and supporters argue that 99% of Wikipedia would remain intact. However, these ideas have not been put into practice.

===Unblocking and reblocking===
Beginning from [[October 10]], [[2006]], conflicting reports came in from different parts of China about a possible lifting of the block. The first report of a change was by a [[blogger]] in [[Liuzhou]], [[Guangxi]], who posted his finding to an online forum at about 6 pm on [[October 10]], [[2006]], [[Chinese Standard Time|Beijing Time]].<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.chinese-forums.com/showthread.php?t=13293| title=”Wikipedia Unblocked?” thread| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=Chinese-forums.com}}</ref> However, access appears to differ depending on location and Internet service provider as a result of more fine-grained blocking. According to initial reports by bloggers within China, [[China Netcom]] residential DSL in Beijing allowed access to English Wikipedia but denied access to Chinese Wikipedia. Meanwhile [[China Telecom]] DSL in [[Shanghai]] allowed access to both, as did [[CETC-CHINACOMM Communications Co. Ltd]] in Beijing. Various providers in [[Anhui]] blocked access to Chinese Wikipedia but not to the English version.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/10/11/china-partially-unblocks-wikipedia/| title=China PARTIALLY unblocks Wikipedia| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=andrewlih.com blog}}</ref> Posters to the [[Slashdot]] online forum who stated that they were in Beijing further noted that while they could access the English language version of the {{srlink|Tiananmen Square}} article, which includes a brief description of the 1989 protests, the {{srlink|Tiananmen Square protests of 1989}} article remained blocked.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=200323&cid=16403351| title=”I’m In Beijing and Here I Go…”| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=Slashdot user perfectlynormalbeast}}</ref> There was a similar report that the article {{srlink|democracy}} was available on English Wikipedia, while {{srlink|Falun Gong}} was unavailable.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.danwei.org/internet/wikipedia_unblocked_but_is_nan.php| title=”Wikipedia unblocked, but is Nanny throttling Youtube uploads?” | accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=DANWEI blog user}}</ref> In contrast, [[Reporters Without Borders]] stated on [[12 October]] that English Wikipedia appeared entirely unblocked, including the article on the 1989 protests, but that the Chinese language version was unaccessible for most Chinese. The advocacy organization criticized the government shift as meant “to appease its critics abroad while continuing to censor the information available to its own population,” while congratulating “those in charge of Wikipedia, especially [[Jimmy Wales]]”.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=15374| title=”China: Government unblocks access to Wikipedia’s English-language version” | accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=Reporters Without Borders press release}}</ref> Wikipedia users state that other language editions, including [[German Wikipedia|German]], [[Japanese Wikipedia|Japanese]], and [[Korean Wikipedia|Korean]] are available at this time.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AVillage_pump_%28news%29&diff=81562442&oldid=81113373| title=Wikipedia:Village pump (news) | accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=Statement by Wikipedia user m.e.}}</ref>

On [[10 November]] [[2006]], blogger [[Andrew Lih]] reported that Chinese Wikipedia appeared to have been fully unblocked.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/10/chinese-wikipedia-now-fully-unblocked/| title=”Chinese Wikipedia now fully unblocked?” | accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=andrewlih.com blog}}</ref> Lih confirmed the full unblocking several days later and offered a partial analysis of the effects based on the rate of new account creation on Chinese Wikipedia. Prior to the unblocking, 300-400 new accounts were created on Chinese Wikipedia daily. In the four days since the unblocking, the rate of new registrations more than tripled to over 1,200 daily, jumping into the second fastest growing Wikipedia after the English version. Similarly, there were 75% more articles created in the week ending on November 13th than during the week before. Coming on the same weekend that Chinese Wikipedia passed the 100,000 article mark, Lih predicted that the second 100,000 would come quickly but that the existing body of Chinese Wikipedia users would have their hands full teaching the new users and teaching them basic Wikipedia policies and norms.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/13/chinese-wikipedias-surge-in-growth/| title=”Chinese Wikipedia’s Surge in Growth” | accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=andrewlih.com blog}}</ref>

On [[16 November]], [[2006]], [[Reuters]] news agency reported the main page of the [[Chinese language]] version of Wikipedia ([[:zh:|zh.wikipedia.org]]) could be displayed and searches for apolitical terms turned up results, but some subjects remained blocked, such as “[[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|June 4]]”.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&storyID=2006-11-16T131905Z_01_PEK60024_RTRUKOC_0_US-CHINA-INTERNET.xml&src=111606_0854_ARTICLE_PROMO_also_on_reuters| title=”Wikipedia unblocked in China after year-long ban”| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=Reuters}}</ref> However, subsequent reports suggested that both the Chinese and English versions had been reblocked the next day on [[17 November]]. It is not yet confirmable if the unblocking that occurred in October and November 2006 was due to technical problems of the so-called “[[Great Firewall of China]]” or for any other reasons.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.danwei.org/internet/the_nanny_changes_her_mind_wik.php| title=”The Nanny changes her mind: Wikipedia blocked again”| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=DANWEI}}</ref>

On [[15 June]] [[2007]], the block was lifted, with the exception several “sensitive” articles and the Chinese Wikipedia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/online/new-media/news/index.cfm?newsid=3540 |title=English Wikipedia unblocked in China |accessdate=2007-06-20}}</ref> On [[25 July]] [[2007]], the Chinese Wikipedia was unblocked as well, only to be blocked again shortly thereafter.

The number of blocked articles is slowly increasing, and now includes several talk pages. Users in China who attempt to access a blocked article or any page on the Chinese Wikipedia are prevented from accessing any Wikimedia site for a period of sixty seconds.

==[[Chinese mainland]] administrators working under blockage==

Over one billion Chinese are blocked from using the Wikipedia. Mainland China has the largest number of administrators for the [[Chinese Wikipedia]], total of 30. Even though the Chinese government has spent billions of [[RMB]] on building the [[Golden Shield Project]] to prevent people to get connected to sites such as wikipedia, the mainland Chinese administrators are able to bypass this expensive project without any problems.

The capital city – [[Beijing]] has 6 administrators, [[Shanghai]] has 5, [[Guangdong]] province has 7, [[Hunan]] province has 1, [[Jiangsu]] province has 3, [[Shanxi]] province has 1, [[Shandong]] province has 1, [[Zhejiang]] province has 1, [[Heilongjiang]] province has 1, [[Hubei]] has 1, [[Hebei]] has 1, other area has 1. <ref>[http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:管理员名单 List of Moderators]</ref>

One administrator from the capital city Beijing [http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shizhao Shizhao] is also a Wikipedia Bureaucrat. Three others from Guangdong are also [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats]]. At the same time, none of the sixteen administrators from [[Hong kong]] is a bureaucrat.

The administrators in several Chinese cities are able to openly advertise for meetings and have met in person. No one has reported any police spying activities during those meetings.

==Chinese Wikipedia self-censorship==
{{main|Chinese Wikipedia}}
November 30th, 2006, CBS published an online article named: [http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/11/30/publiceye/entry2218394.shtml Is Wikipedia China Really Wikipedia?]

In December 2006, the [[International Herald Tribune]] Asia-Pacific<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/29/news/wiki.php "Chinese-language Wikipedia presents different view of history"] By Howard W. French / The New York Times, Published: November 29, 2006.</ref> published an article that sensitive topics get gentle treatment on Chinese Wikipedia.

{{cquote|But on sensitive questions of China’s modern history or on hot-button issues, the Chinese version diverges so dramatically from its English counterpart that it sometimes reads as if it were approved by the censors themselves.

For some, the Chinese version of Wikipedia was intended as just such a resource, but its tame approach to sensitive topics has sparked a fierce debate in the world of online mavens over its objectivity and thoroughness.

On the evidence of entries like this, for the moment, the fight over editorial direction of Wikipedia in Chinese is being won by enthusiasts who practice self-censorship.}}

== Reaction ==
Chinese Wikipedians have expressed fears about the detrimental effects that a permanent ban would have. First of all, the block deprives a useful resource from the majority of Chinese speakers in the world. Moreover, since mainland Chinese form a significant portion of the Chinese Wikipedia community (46% of all users in March 2005), a long-term block could severely stunt the growth of Wikipedia similar to the June 2004 block. Finally, as the presence of contributors from multiple communities and viewpoints has helped in ensuring neutrality in some controversial topics (e.g. [[Taiwan independence]]), the sudden removal of one community could exacerbate [[systemic bias]] on the Chinese Wikipedia.

As of now, there is a general anti-Chinese government bias on the majority of articles included in the Chinese version of Wikipedia compare to the English version, likely due to the bans. This bias is likely to fuel further bans in mainland China.

== Circumvention of the block ==
Technically adept Internet users in China are currently able to circumvent the block fairly easily (using almost any [[anonymous proxy]]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Advice_to_users_using_Tor_to_bypass_the_Great_Firewall|title=”Wikipedia:Advice to users using Tor to bypass the Great Firewall|accessdate=2007-02-14| publisher=en.wikipedia.org}}</ref> They may view but not edit Wikipedia in this manner, as a proposed Wikipedia policy ([[Wikipedia:No open proxies]]) prevents users from editing using open proxies and many administrators block open proxies in a way so even registered users can not use them to edit articles.

[[Psiphon]] software, announced in December 2006, claims to allow Internet-blocked countries such as China to access [[Wikipedia]]. Michael Hull, Psiphon’s lead engineer, told [[CBC News]] Online, “We’re aiming at giving people access to sites like Wikipedia.”<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2006/12/01/censor-tool.html| title=”Tool to circumvent internet censorship set to launch”| accessdate=2006-12-24| publisher=cbc.ca}}</ref>

== References ==
{{reflist|colwidth=35em}}

== See also ==
*[[Chinese Wikipedia]]
*[[Internet censorship in mainland China]]
*[[Golden Shield Project]]
*[[Politics of the People's Republic of China]]
*[[Human rights in the People's Republic of China]]
*[[Baidu Baike]]

== External links ==
{{wikinews|Chinese ban of Wikimedia enters tenth week}}
{{meta|China block}}

*[http://zh.wikipedia.org/ Chinese Wikipedia]

News reports
*[http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=15374 Reporters without Borders article]
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/16/technology/16wikipedia.html?ex=1318651200&en=ff16408103d54a91&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss New York Times Article]
*[http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/11/30/publiceye/entry2218394.shtml CBS News Article]
*[http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&storyID=2007-06-20T054446Z_01_PEK218139_RTRIDST_0_TECH-PRIVACY-CHINA-COL.XML Reuters Canada Article]
*[http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/56E47A37-840F-4CC3-B2FA-DE5F839F7ACE.htm Aljazeera Article].
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6154444.stm ''China 'unblocks' Wikipedia site''] (BBC News)
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/19/AR2006021901335.html ''Reference Tool On Web Finds Fans, Censors''] (Washington Post Foreign Service)
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/19/AR2006021900851.html ''Full Text: Cui Objects to Wikipedia Shutdown''] (translated by The Washington Post Beijing Bureau)
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/18/AR2006021800672.html ''Full Text: Shi's Defense of Wikipedia''] (translated by The Washington Post Beijing Bureau)
*[http://www.cnn.com/interactive/world/0603/explainer.china.internet/frameset.exclude.html China and Internet Censorship] (CNN.com)
*[http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/69963 Authorities block access to online encyclopaedia] (International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX))
* [http://www.cbc.ca/thehour/video.php?id=1089 Wikipedia Versus China] ”[[The Hour]]” with [[George Stroumboulopoulos]], interview with Jimmy Wales, 13 Oct. 2006


The banned article on “Chinese wikipedia” on wikipedia site

June 4, 2007

The chinese language wikipedia has been banned in China for three times, and it is still blocked. however, many of the administrators actually work directly from China, quite a few working directly from the capital city – Beijing, and a few from big cities. Chinese police are well known for spying on its own people’s internet activities, it is simply a wonder why those “brave” administrators dare to work for a banned site?

wikipedia claims it is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but right now, this article is locked, and this article’s current version is written by those administrators working for the “Chinese language wikipedia,” so you can imagine how “neutral” the wikipedia article is.

Here is the part of banned version in its original source code which wikipedia doesn’t want the world to know the truth!

——

[[Image:Wikipedia-logo-zh.png|thumb|200px|The Chinese Wikipedia logo]]

”’Chinese Wikipedia”’ is the [[Chinese language]] edition of [[Wikipedia]], run by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]]. Started in October 2002, the Chinese Wikipedia has, as of [[December]] [[2006]], over 103,000 articles. Currently, it is [[Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China|blocked by the Chinese government]] together with all the other wikipedia in other languages. It has 86 moderators, including 29 from [[mainland China]], 16 from [[Taiwan]], and 14 from [[Hong Kong]].

==History==
The Chinese Wikipedia was established along with 12 other Wikipedias in May 2001. At the beginning, however, the Chinese Wikipedia did not support Chinese characters, and had no encyclopedic content.

It was in October 2002 that the user ‘Ghyll’ (now [[:zh:User:Mountain]]) wrote the first Chinese-language page, the Main Page. Mountain is also the first registered user of the Chinese Wikipedia. A software update on [[October 27]], [[2002]] allowed Chinese language input. The domain was set to be [http://zh.wikipedia.org/ zh.wikipedia.org]. On [[November 17]], [[2002]], Mountain translated the ”[[Computer science]]” article into [[:zh:计算机科学]], thus creating the first real encyclopedic article.

In its early days, most articles on the Chinese Wikipedia were translated from the English version. The first five sysops: [[:zh:User:Samuel]], [[:zh:User:Menchi]], [[:zh:User:Lorenzarius]], [[:zh:User:Formulax]], and [[:zh:User:Shizhao]], were promoted on [[June 14]], [[2003]]. Since then, Shizhao in particular has performed many maintenance tasks, and was also instrumental in removing the first [[blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China]] in June 2004.

Wikipedia was first introduced by [[mainland China]] media in the newspaper ”[[China Computer Education]]” (中国电脑教育报) on [[October 20]], [[2003]], in the article, “I, too, shall write an encyclopedia” (我也来写百科全书). On [[May 16]], [[2004]], Wikipedia was first reported by Taiwanese media in the newspaper ”[[China Times]]”. Since then, many newspapers have published articles about Wikipedia, and several sysops have been interviewed by journalists.

==Chinese administrators==

At the end of 2006, 89 moderators are managing the site.

Wikipedia is [[Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China|blocked by the Chinese government]], however, mainland China actually has the largest number of administrators for the Chinese Wikipedia, total of 29 members strong. They are able to go around the [[Golden Shield Project]]’s block, when the rest of the over one billion Chinese are not able to get on the Chinese wikipedia.

China’s capital city – Beijing has 6, [[Shanghai]] has 6, [[Guangdong]] province has 6, [[Hunan]] province has 1, [[Jiangsu]] province has 3, [[Shanxi]] province has 1, [[Shandong]] province has 1, [[Zhejiang]] province has 1, [[Heilongjiang]] province has 1, [[Hubei]] has 1, other areas have 2. Total of 29.<ref>[http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:管理员名单 List of Moderators]</ref>

Other Chinese concentrated areas, such as [[Taiwan]] has 16, [[Hong Kong]] has 13, [[Macau]] has 3. [[Singapore]] has none. there are 9 in the United States, 5 in Canada, 3 in Macau, 3 in the United Kingdom, 1 in Australia, 1 in France, 1 in Germany, 1 in Japan, 1 in South Korea, and 2 unspecified.

After the Chinese government unblocked the wikipedia for the first time, one month later, the first Chinese Wikipedian meeting was held in [[Beijing]] on [[July 25]], [[2004]]. Even though Wikipedia is still blocked in mainland China, the moderators in several Chinese cities are still openly advertising for meetings on the site, and have met in person. So far, there is no [[surveillance]] or [[harassment]] report about the Chinese police or similar kind.

Since then, Chinese Wikipedians from different regions have held many gatherings in [[Beijing]], [[Shanghai]], [[Guangdong]], [[Hong Kong]], and [[Taiwan]]. In particular, a semi-regular meetup has been held in [[Taipei]] every one to three weeks since April 2006. In July 2006, Taiwanese Wikipedians also held a “travelling meetup”, travelling by train through four Taiwanese cities over a period of two days. In August 2006, Hong Kong hosted the first annual [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CWMC_2006 Chinese Wikimedia Conference].

==Community==
The Chinese Wikipedia encompasses participants from a variety of backgrounds. According to statistics from March 2005, 46% of users connect from [[mainland China]], 22% from [[North America]], 12% from [[Taiwan]], 9% from [[Hong Kong]], 3% from [[Japan]], 3% from [[Europe]], 2% from [[Southeast Asia]], and 3% from other regions. Just as the [[English Wikipedia]] tends to be more detailed in [[Western world|western]]-related topics, the Chinese Wikipedia has very detailed descriptions of [[China]]-related topics. Within that region, the Chinese Wikipedia tends to be more detailed in topics about Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the wealthy east coast provinces of mainland China, reflecting the economic disparity in that part of the world.

Also due to the geographical origin of its participants, the most discussed and debated topics on the Chinese Wikipedia are those related to [[Taiwanese independence]], [[Falun Gong]], the [[Tiananmen Protests of 1989]], and so forth; the five most edited articles, as of July 2006, are [[Mao Zedong]], [[China]], the [[People's Republic of China]], the [[Republic of China]], and [[Chiang Kai-shek]], in that order. In contrast, issues such as the [[Israel-Palestinian conflict]] are much less contentious.

In order to avoid [[systemic bias]], one of the cornerstones of the Chinese Wikipedia (along with [[NPOV|neutral point-of-view]]) is avoiding [[sinocentrism]]. Editors are advised to avoid writing from the point-of-view of China or any other country/region; to avoid using terms such as 我国/我國 (“our country”; referring to the [[People's Republic of China]] or the [[Republic of China]], depending on viewpoint), 本港 (“this port”; referring to Hong Kong), or 本澳 (“this Macao”, referring to Macao); and instead, to refer to locations in the Chinese-speaking sphere or periods in [[Chinese history]] by explicitly stating China (e.g. “[[Yunnan]] province, China”, instead of just “[[Yunnan]] province”.)

==Blocking of Wikipedia==
{{Main|Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China}}

Internet has been partially censored in [[mainland China]] almost as early Internet got connected to China. Recently, China has spent about 8 billion US dollars on the [[Golden Shield Project]] to improve the censorship ability. The [[People's Republic of China]] and its [[internet service provider]]s have adopted a [[internet censorship in mainland China|practice of blocking]] contentious Internet sites in [[mainland China]], and Wikimedia sites have been blocked at least three times in its history.
The first block lasted between [[June 2]] and [[June 21]], [[2004]]. It began when access to the Chinese Wikipedia from [[Beijing]] was blocked on the 15th anniversary of the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]].

On [[May 31]] an article from the IDG News Service was published [http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,116323,00.asp], discussing the Chinese Wikipedia’s treatment of the protests. The Chinese Wikipedia also has articles related to [[Taiwanese independence]], written by contributors from Taiwan and elsewhere. A few days after the initial block of Chinese Wikipedia, all [[Wikimedia]] sites were blocked in Mainland China. In response to the blocks, two moderators prepared an appeal to lift the block and asked their regional [[internet service provider]] to submit it. All Wikimedia sites were unblocked between [[June 17]] and [[June 21]], [[2004]]. One month later, the first Chinese Wikipedian moderators’ meeting was held in the capital city – Beijing on July 25, 2004.

The first block had an effect on the vitality of Chinese Wikipedia, which [http://en.wikipedia.org/wikistats/EN/TablesWikipediaZH.htm suffered sharp dips in various indicators] such as the number of new users, the number of new articles, and the number of edits. In some cases, it took anywhere from 6 to 12 months in order to regain the stats from May 2004. On the other hand, on today’s site, some of the articles are put into protection which may last more than a month or more without any actions.

The second and less serious outage lasted between [[September 23]] and [[September 27]], [[2004]]. During this 4-day period, access to Wikipedia was erratic or unavailable to some users in mainland China &mdash; this block was not comprehensive and some users in mainland China were never affected. The exact reason for the block is a mystery. Chinese Wikipedians once again prepared a written appeal to regional ISPs, but the block was lifted before the appeal was actually sent. The reason is unknown.

The third block began on [[October 19]], [[2005]], and there is no indication as to whether this block is temporary or permanent, or what the reasons or causes for this block are. According to the [[:zh:Wikipedia:状况回报|status page]] currently maintained on the Chinese Wikipedia, the [[Florida]] and [[Korea]] [[server]]s are blocked, while the [[Paris]] and [[Amsterdam]] servers are not. Dozens of editors from across [[Mainland China]] have [[:zh:Wikipedia talk:状况回报|reported]] that they can only access Wikipedia using proxy servers, although there are isolated reports that some users can access Wikipedia without using proxy. Most of the Chinese people were not able to connect to this site at all.

During October and November of 2006, it first appeared that the this site was unblocked again. Many conflicting reports came from news outlets, bloggers, and Wikipedians, reported a possible partial or full unblocking of Wikipedia. Some reports indicated a complete unblock; others suggested that some sensitive topics remained blocked, and yet other suggested that the Chinese Wikipedia was blocked while other language versions were not. From November 17 onwards, the complete block was once again in place. It is still unknown when the next unblock will be.

An attempt to appeal to the government was made in October 2005, but was met with no response. Since then, no more plans for appeals have been made.

==Self-censorship==

November 30th, 2006, CBS published an online article named: [http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/11/30/publiceye/entry2218394.shtml Is Wikipedia China Really Wikipedia?]

In December, 2006, according to [[International Herald Tribune]] Asia-Pacific, sensitive topics get gentle treatment on the Chinese wikipedia.

{{cquote| But on sensitive questions of China’s modern history or on hot-button issues, the Chinese version diverges so dramatically from its English counterpart that it sometimes reads as if it were approved by the censors themselves.

For some, the Chinese version of Wikipedia was intended as just such a resource, but its tame approach to sensitive topics has sparked a fierce debate in the world of online mavens over its objectivity and thoroughness.

On the evidence of entries like this, for the moment, the fight over editorial direction of Wikipedia in Chinese is being won by enthusiasts who practice self-censorship.}}<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/29/news/wiki.php Chinese-language Wikipedia presents different view of history]</ref>

On December 1, 2006, The [[New York Times]] published another report by Howard W. French, titled as “Wikipedia lays bare two versions of China’s past.”
{{cquote|
Some say the object should be to spread reliable information as widely as possible, and that, in any case, self-censorship is pointless because the government still frequently blocks access to Wikipedia for most Chinese Internet users. ‘There is a lot of confusion about whether they should obey the neutral point of view or offer some compromises to the government,’ said Isaac Mao, a well-known Chinese blogger and user of the encyclopedia. ‘To the local Wikipedians, the first objective is to make it well known among Chinese, to get people to understand the principles of Wikipedia step by step, and not to get the thing blocked by the government.}}

And “the articles are already pre-censored by party-leaning moderators and users.” <ref>[http://digg.com/political_opinion/Wikipedia_lays_bare_two_versions_of_China_s_past user comment]</ref> There is no evidence that the Chinese site had any discussion about those two articles even though the moderators are all aware of.

;Examples

What happened in [[Tibet]] in 1950 was 56 years ago. On the chinese wikipedia, before 11-23, 2006, that part of history was written as “in 1950, the government of People’s Republic of China signed “peaceful liberation treaty” with the Tibetan government, under the condition of respecting Tibetan’s system and life style, the liberation army was allowed to enter tibet.” When a user tried to added the detailed history for that period of time, his contribution was deleted as “vandalism” twice by two Chinese moderators on 11-23, and 12-6, 2006. [http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E8%A5%BF%E8%97%8F%E5%8E%86%E5%8F%B2&diff=2993090&oldid=2993080] [http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E8%A5%BF%E8%97%8F%E5%8E%86%E5%8F%B2&diff=3084041&oldid=3083995]

As of December 29th, 2006, the article of People’s Republic of China on the Chinese site did not mention anything about the well-known [[Falun Gong]] which originated in mainland China. And the phrase “Human Rights” was only mentioned once under the name “Organization for Human Rights.” There was no direct link to the “Human rights in the People’s Republic of China” article, either. While the English site of [[People's Republic of China]] has an entire paragraph about Human Rights, and also a direct link to [[Human rights in the People's Republic of China]]. It was added only when a user mentioned in the English version of Village Pump, then the moderator Ran added the word “falun gong.” [http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD&diff=3233627&oldid=3214644]

==Competitors==

On [[April 20]], [[2006]], the online Chinese search engine company [[Baidu]] created [[Baidu Baike]], an online encyclopedia that registered users can edit, pending administrator reviews. The content of the encyclopedia is self-censored in accordance with the regulations of the Chinese government. Within weeks, the number of articles in Baidu Baike had surpassed that of the Chinese Wikipedia.

==References==
<references/>

==See also==
*[[Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China]]
*[[Internet censorship in mainland China]]
*[[Golden Shield Project]]
*[[Politics of China]]
*[[meta:Automatic conversion between simplified and traditional Chinese|Comprehensive technical information about automatic conversion on the Chinese Wikipedia between Simplified and Traditional Chinese]]