It is very simple, because it is managed by bunch of jobless OCD patients who obviously have no life. That is why they can “volunteer” their free time on that site from day till night. Therefore, the possibility of wikipedia becoming a trustworthy site is improbable.
However, it is very simple and easy to make that site an actual trustworthy encyclopedia.
First of all, get rid of all those free amateur administrators who clearly have OCD.
Second, start advertising on their web site, then they can make some money, not for profit, but to use those money to hire professionals.
Third, once they get the money, they can start hiring some real professors, people who are professional in all those particular subjects. For example, they can go to colleges, pay a little money to those college biology professors, ask them to take their time to proofread or edit all those biological articles. They don’t even have to hire any ivy league college professors. Regular college professors should be sufficient. By doing so, those professors can be paid for a little amount of money. Those money can’t make those professors rich, but it is a good way to compensate them for their good efforts.
Forth, ordinary people can still edit, but their editions have to be proved by professional people. And their names will be published to show that they stand by what they have proofread. And they will write out their professional opinion why particular editions were not proved. Therefore, they won’t be any arguments.
Currently idiots at wikipedia are constantly asking people for money, it is just a waste of money to give them any money. Because you are just donating money for OCD idiots who have no real life jobs, who like to “volunteer” to manage wikipedia, who like to waste their lives away on that stupid site.
The Wikipedia people have no life, but neither do you. Seriously, looking at this wordpress your ‘crusade’ is nothing short of pathetic. You’ve been doing this site for four years. Jesus Christ.
mm, so are you telling everyone that you have been stalking me for four years already? if that is not pathetic, what is it then?
that is exactly another thing that I want to point out, many of the wikipedia admins are stalkers. they stalk anyone who did something on wikipedia that they didn’t like. so be aware, everyone. this walter is the perfect example.
Are you really that dense and don’t know how your own website works? Your archive shows that this site has been up for four years.
do you know how long wikipedia has existed, is it becoming a great site or is it going down by the minute? Comparing with that site, my blog is still going strong.
What does that have to do with *anything* I just said? Is your reading comprehension really that bad?