Wikipedia is obsessed with penis, free erect penis pictures for everyone to see!

It seems that wikipedia has a fascination with penis! yes, that is right. It is really free pornography for everyone! There is no age requirement, as long as the kids know how to type the word penis on that page, they will be able to see plenty of real life pictures of penis soft and erect! Can you imagine if those pictures were shown on TV or magazines, or textbooks, angry parents will certainly file plenty of lawsuits against whoever did that. But on wikipedia, it is open for early sex education.

Not so long ago, it even had a real picture a elephant penis! You sure can’t find that anywhere else.

Thanks to the wonderful free donors, the penis page has had plenty of free pornography pictures.

They seem to constantly update those free porn pictures almost weekly. Parents, don’t worry, wikipedia is claimed be kid-safe, what your kids can’t find on those locked sites, they can find plenty on wikipedia. I am sure that those very dedicated OCD administrators have spent a lot of time on choosing which penis pictures to be published, which erected penis pictures will be more approriate for the children. There are plenty of penis pictures, just click on history and find more. Here are some sample pictures for the whole world to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=190018404
Two new fully erected penis pictures

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=164889591
Three different fully erected real penis pictures, plus one penis with piercing

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=136875061
Two different penis pictures in color, and same black and white penis picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=123112225
One picture of a penis soft and erect, black and white penis picture, and a ampallang pierced penis (somehow, this picture didn’t last long.)

You can also find plenty free porn pictures on other related subjects, such as vagina.

Free porns by anyone, and for everyone, that is the essence of wikipedia!

How to act like a professional on wikipedia?

We all know there are plenty OCD patients that are managing the wikipedia site, they constantly piss people off by reverting and deleting other people’s contribution.

So how can you fight back? This is quite easy, just act like one of them, here is how.

1. When you want to revert what those idiots deleted, do not use your regular user name on there, always use an annoymous IP address.

2. Always enter the following on “Edit summary”, you can enter all, or just one or two: “personal attack, POV, unsourced POV, revert vandalism, revert repeated vandalism.”

3. If they give you a warning, ask you to stop “vandalizing” the articles, this is also easy to do. First, you ignore their warning. Second, you should just copy whatever they wrote to you without their signature part, and paste that to their discussion page, and be sure to sign with your own user name or IP.

That way you will make those OCD patients look bad, and make your own edition the correct one, because after all, they are vandalizing the page, and you are doing good things by reverting them back.

Wikipedia encourages multiple personality disorder, multiple fake accounts on that site!

In the last article, it was mentioned that in order to avoid OCD administrators, it is a very good idea to create new accounts often to avoid being stalked by those administrators. Well, it seems that wikipedia not only is creating more and more OCD patients, it also is encouraging people to have multiple personality disorders.

Just read this article,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOCK#Legitimate_uses_of_multiple_accounts

It has “Multiple accounts have legitimate uses.” “Some editors use multiple accounts to segregate their contributions for various reasons.”

It is certainly not a surprise. Wikipedia has some pizza delivery man as their administrator, so it won’t hurt to encourage people to have as many fake accounts as they want. After all, to be an administrator on wikipedia, no education is required.

In real life, will any government allow its citizens to have several fake IDs? Can students at schools have several user names to get on the school’s computer system? Do the public allow the politicians to have several different identities? Where else in the world that allows people to have multiple accounts? Nowhere else, but on wikipedia.

First, wikipedia creates more and more OCD patients, now it also encourages people to have multiple personality disorders. That is why that site is so popular with so many mental patients managing that site. Each and everyday, it attracts more and more mental patients eager waiting and applying to the next OCD administrators. After all, those people can’t keep a real job in real life, they are nobody in real life, but wikipedia gives them a sense of “pride” and importance that they have never achieved before.

wikipedia wants you to look at people’s pubic hair pictures!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pubic_hair

ya, do you know what “pubic hair” means? well, don’t worry, just click on that link, you will understand the meaning of pubic hair! And if you can’t understand it, you can look at those free real pubic hair pictures, including a black male and a white female’s uncovered NAKED genital pictures shown their pubic hair.

yea, parents, don’t worry about your little children reading articles on wikipedia, wikipedia is children friendly, anyone can read that pubic hair article with no problem at all.

wikipedia, the free porn site, free for all!

wikipedia is indeed a free and popular pornographic encyclopedia

wikipedia is indeed an free pornographic encyclopedia, it has so many biographies of many porn stars, it even have an article on “pornographic actor”, the history, actors, pay rates, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographic_actress

Yea, parents, if you want your children to be a porn star, wikipedia is the good place to start, it is free, and your children can browse all the dirty porno information even in the local libriries through wikipedia.

so there is no need to worry if your children are using wikipedia at all, wikipedia is safe for little children, free porno information for everyone.

here is one example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christy_Canyon

a pornography actress

anyone under 18 should be banned from editing wikipedia for possible wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_of_Naruto:_Shippūden

“The plot of the second part of the manga and anime series Naruto”

Yes, that is one of the article on wikipedia, it is several pages long. You would think that just one article about one cartoon is good enough. Are you surprised that there is a seperate article about a “plot” that appeared in one of the cartoon.

And there are many many more similar articles about many cartoons, articles about each inidividual characters that appeared in those thousands if not millions cartoons. How valueable are those articles? zero. Who has time to read those articles, and why does anyone who has a normal social life even care to read about every little characters that ever appeared in a animation tv show?

Yet who are those people who wrote those articles? who else, bunch of nerdy teenagers. While other cool popular teeangers are busy having sex, socializing with other people, those nerdy teenagers stay at home, watch cartoons, then get on wikipedia spend their time writing articles about those cartoon characters, and start editing wars with other nerdy OCD administrators and teeangers.

Those teenagers already have no life by staying at home. Now wikipedia gives them a false sense of pride by calling them “editors” of an online “encyclopedia.” All of sudden, those nerds become someone important. If they are not able to have any social interactions in real life, at least, they can communicate with strangers all over the world on wikipedia. It makes them feel as if they are “contributing” for the good of the society.

oh, come on, who cares to read about what they wrote about millions of the cartoon characters?

It is a waste of their life. And it creates personality disorders if those teeangers stay on wikipedia for too long. No one who has a real social life can possibly spend hours and hours on that site writing articles.

Teenagers are the group that most likely to form internet addiction. Their brains are still developing. wikipedia creates addiction and OCD especially for teenagers who are lack of self-control.

Therefore, for your own teenagers’ good mental health, all parents should ban their teenagers editing wikipedia articles. It is ideal if all parents just simply block the wikipedia access for their own good. There are plenty real reference sites online that are free and free of errors.

another false wikipedia biography profile. someone is suing one of the wikipedia editor.

Pro golfer Fuzzy Zoeller is suing to track down the author of what Zoeller says is a defamatory paragraph about him on the Wikipedia site.

http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/11769&t51hb

That site has plenty of unverified fake altered biographies, because no one is paid to verify all of them. It is a good thing that some colleges now ban their students from quoting that site full or errors. After all, a little kid can get online and edit those biographies as long as his/her editions look real and “professional.”

wikipedia user khoikhoi has some serious OCD problem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Khoikhoi

idiots at wikipedia deleted this message. so i am posting it here. those idiots have gone crazy, they kept the vandalized version of articles.

== [[User:khoikhoi]] has some serious [[OCD]], he should be banned==

This [[User:khoikhoi]] has some serious [[Obsessive-compulsive disorder]], he is here to piss people off, he is here to revert vandalized version of articles. Here is a perfect example of this idiot khoikhoi, he reverted a vandalized version, because he has gone crazy. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_Revolution&oldid=97600794 cultural revolution]

and look at what he just did today, he reverted several vandalized Chinese articles. I tried to correct him, he continued to vandalize. after he reverted those vandalized version, then he put those vandalized articles under protection.

this idiot + loser can’t think. someone should ban this OCD patient quick before he loses control!

wikipeda and yo mama.

so last time, I found out that there is a lengthy article about the word fuck on wikipedia.

now i just found out that there is an article that is called ”your mom.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Your_Mom

And there is a section called ”me doing your mom.” and wikipedia defined it as ”This section documents a current event.”

so we can see that wikipedia is really nothing, but plenty of bs and a real dirty sex encyclopedia.

Wikipedia generated Obsessive-compulsive disorder

”’Obsessive-compulsive disorder”’ (”’OCD”’) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by a subject’s obsessive, intrusive thoughts and related compulsions (tasks or “rituals”) which attempt to neutralize the obsessions. The newest disorder is named as “Wikipedia generated Obsessive-compulsive disorder.” It is a sub-category of OCD.

Wikipedia gives many people a false sense of grandiose by calling everyone the “editor. It gives those people a fake sense of pride, because they were nobody, now they are “editors” of an encyclopedia, it is as if all of sudden anyone without a formal education is a college professor. It is a serious cyber machine that is destroying many people’s regular life, by making them more miserable and angry, many of the new users who have tendency of being obsesive complusive, actually become a patient of Obsessive-Compuslive disorder due to the bully administrators who do not respect other people’s work.

wikipedia creates addiction and obsessive compulsive disorder people, especially for their over 3361 administrators. They get the ultimate high by banning other people who tried to edit articles. Many OCD administrators do not really edit articles, they have this disorder, so they are there to piss people off, to revert articles that they don’t like over and over. Hence, their activities piss other people off, so throughout that site, it helps to create more people with OCD.

It is also a world-wide phenomena. It has formats in many other languages. As of January 2007, it has 250 languages, so it is expected that more and more people will be drawn into this worldwide blackhole. As that site continues to grow, it will attract more OCD or OCD-tendency people.

==Signs==
The patient will have a fast heart beat, sweaty palms, can’t sleep well, get angry easily, spend less time engaging real life social activities, lose social touch by indulging in online fighting, the patient must fight till the end until he wins the “editing war.”

==Symptoms==
For the OCD administrators, their sole purpose is to revert anything that are edited by people that they don’t like, to piss people off. They get a sense of accomplishment and natural high. That site is their ultimate mental drug. It does not matter to them if their reverted version is correct or not. They stay online all day and all night, just because they want to ban those particular users that they are fixated on. Even though they are not getting paid for what they are doing, the first thing they do when they are connected to the internet is to see if any banned users are back on again.

The person spends hours on that site, the person will get agitated and angry if he is not allowed to keep his own edition on the articles that he has edited.

==Examples==

;OCD admistrators

Here is an example of this typical OCD administrator Khoikhoi’s[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Khoikhoi] work, he kept reverting a vandalised version,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_Revolution&oldid=97600794] the top of the page was moved to the bottom.

=== Hey, thanks for reporting me ASSHOLE!!! ===

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Penwhale]

Thanks for reporting me for reverting vandalism and removing spam. I had trouble with a spammer who added spam then get pissed because I removed it so he decided that since he couldn’t have any external links that he’d remove them all–even though there had been prior discussion about the one that was there–the only external link I’ve ever seen without advertisements.

Maybe you could watch the articles that I am constantly removing spam from? Everyday websites with advetisements for prostitution are adding external links to Wikipedia and I remove them as quickly as I find them but they keep coming back. Why don’t YOU watch those articles, SHITHEAD?

”’ASSHOLE!!!”’

You fucking cocksucker. If I’m ever blocked again for removing spam or reverting vandalism I AM GOING TO BE THE ONE ADDING SPAM PROMOTING PROSTITUTION TO EVERY ARTICLE I CAN FIND. Just to spite you, asshole! Without ME these adult-related articles would be NOTHING BUT EXTERNAL LINKS AND IN-ARTICLE SPAM. GOT IT ASSHOLE??? <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Monkeybreath|Monkeybreath]] ([[User talk:Monkeybreath|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Monkeybreath|contribs]]) 10:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!– HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned –>

===List of OCD administrators===

*Khoikhoi [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Khoikhoi]

===List of OCD administrators===

*Khoikhoi [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Khoikhoi]

*Ginkgo100 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ginkgo100]
===List of OCD users===

*Musical Linguist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Musical_Linguist]

*Gunslinger47 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gunslinger47]
*Someguy0830 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Someguy0830]
*Tjstrf [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tjstrf]