Wikipedia should be banned on all public computers.

1. It has way too many dirty pornography materials and photos. Children can read articles about any kinds of pornography articles, actors, etc; and click on those pictures easily from any public computers. Parents can set password on their own TVs, but parents and schools can’t control what children want to read on wikipedia, because they just assumed that wikipedia is actually a “clean” encyclopedia. If those pictures can’t be shown in public, then they are not suitable for Children. Therefore, wikipedia should be banned from public school computers.

2. It has too many errors. A child can edit any articles on there as long as the edition sounds reasonable. And there are highly scientific articles which are rarely checked by any experts. Therefore, a mistake can be taken for real fact, which will not help the readers at all. And those OCD wikipedia editors who have no job in real life obviously don’t have the knowledge to tell which is wrong, which is correct.

Most public libraries already have enough printed encyclopedia and books on many subjects, they don’t need wikipedia. Some of the libraries even have paid account on some serious real online encyclopedia, such as britannica.

3. wikipedia creates obsession compulsive disorder! That is the fact, just look at those wikipedia editors, the first thing after they wake up in the morning is to check wikipedia, the last thing they do before bed is to check wikipedia. The world is not a perfect place, if those idiots can spend more than 8 hours a day on wikipedia, why can’t they go out of their homes, use that time to volunteer, and change someone’s life for real. Those OCD editors just love to exasperate people by reverting and reverting people’s editions. Some of them probably don’t even pay for their internet, they just go to public libraries and use them to annoy those real experts who are trying to help to improve wikipedia.

wikipedia is a web site which is ran by creepy cyber stalkers!

just look at this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse

they have everything. How many of those people listed on that page are real life criminals? However, this creepy wikipedia has everything of what a typical stalker does on the internet.

Those OCD administrators constantly put this on someone’s personal user page:”An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of..” In real life, can someone paint someone’s house with “a neighbor has expressed a concern that this person may be a gang member of ..?” No one can do that in real life, but on this creepy wikipedia site, OCD administrators can do whatever they want, they can delete some user’s front page entirely, and just put that on that person’s page.

Another example:”This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that they have used one or more accounts abusively..” Can you put someone in jail just because you suspect something, but that is what they are doing on wikipedia daily. Wikipedia has no laws, as long as you are the OCD administrators, you can make up laws daily.

On wikipedia, those psychotic administrators always assume that “I suspect, therefore you must be guilty of something.”

They even have a “counter vandalism unit” on wikipedia as if they are some kind heroic law agent!

This is getting really creepy just to think about it. Those no-life OCD administrators not only spend all their time on there pissing people off, but they are also stalking people on the internet! They are all real life stalkers! yes, that is right. They create “personal pages” for anyone they don’t like, and they name those pages as “long term abuse”, it is more like long term stalking by the OCD wikipedian administrators. On those personal pages, they have: original names, time span, ISP provider, known IPs,severity, etc. They know who those users are, what they like or dislike, their preferences,etc.

The creepiest part about it is that they even have “physical location” listed on those personal pages, sometimes, the person’s real names are also listed!

Are those banned users “hackers” or “criminals against humanity?” Did they do any harm to the society? certainly not!

Who give wikipedia the rights to expose people’s real names, and physical locations on the internet!? What are they going to do with those physical locations and names? Are they going to send some OCD administrators and stalk them in real life?! Why do they want to list someone’s real name on the internet, so they can recruit more stalkers to stalk those innocent people?!

And they even have “instructions” for future wikipedia stalkers, for example, here is one:”Revert all edits, speedy delete new articles, obtain immediate admin assistance to block sockpuppet account and monitor for numerous subsequent sockpuppets. Consider semi-protecting any articles targeted.”

Now not only they are stalking people online, they also like to vandalize wikipedia pages by “reverting all edits.” Is that what a normal sane person would do? Why do you want to revert all edits if you don’t even know if it is correct or not? Why do they want to delete all new articles, what if the new article is actually correct? Who are the people that are really vandalizing wikipedia? It is quite obvious that the psychotic OCD administrators are the ones who are vandalizing wikipedia every minute. And that is the reason why no one is using wikipedia for reference any more.

Indeed, wikipedia is becoming a haven for real life stalkers, they now have a perfect web site to express their stalking activities freely.

psychotic OCD wikipedia administrators, Stop stalking people on the internet before the police send you to the real jails!

Wikipedia is ran by bunch of clueless clowns.

I often wonder if wikipedia is ran by mentally challenged people? This one is proven to be true. Here is a perfect example.

let’s look at this OCD wikipedia administrator, “Can’t sleep, clown will eat me”, yes, that is his/her real user name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Can’t_sleep%2C_clown_will_eat_me

A clown picture was posted, it is probably himself/herself. Under the picture, it has “AHHHH IT’S GOING TO EEEAAAAT MEEE!!!!!! “

Will any serious encyclopedia company ever hire a ridiculous clown looking like a clown to be their administrator or editor? Can this person dress like a clown if he works for microsoft or google? Certainly not. So you know the quality wikipedia has.

Check out all those ridiculous wikipedia stars s/he got. It seems that wikipedia’s mentality is really only at elementary school level, those OCD administrators constantly give each other stars as if they are still in elementary schools. Wikipedia itself is a giant elementary school while obsessed with pornography.

check out those ridiculous names of those stars this clown has got.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar (meaning: pissed off lots of good editors by reverting their good contributions)
The Working Man’s Barnstar (meaning: people who are not working in real life who spend all their time as jobless wikipedia administrators)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (meaning: obsessed with wikipedia, with no real life job, spent most of free time on here)
The Barnstar of Good Humor (Is wikipedia a comedy club? now we know why we can’t take it seriously.)
The Surreal Barnstar (meaning: they spend nighttime on wikipedia as daytime, and daytime for sleeping.)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar (meaning: adamantly refuse to seek counseling for wikipedia generated OCD)
The Purple Star
The Original Barnstar
The Barnstar of Diligence
The Excellent Userpage Award
The Special Barnstar

They obviously have no imaginiation, that is why they ran out of names, that is why they have to name two stars as “original barnstar” and “special barnstar”.

So next time, when you see someone has some stars on his/her page, that means s/he is addicted. S/he must have spent a lot of time working as OCD administrators, and has pissed a lot of real editors in order to get those meaningless stars.

The fundamental serious problem of wikipedia – Banned for lifetime.

It is quite common that someone who only wants to contribute some valuable information on wikipedia, accidently s/he pissed off one of the OCD administrators. That person is banned for lifetime.

Are those banned editors “criminals?” Did they kill someone, or are they the internet terrorists? What did they do that deserve a lifetime ban?

Once that person is banned, anything s/he edits will be be reverted by those wikipedia OCD administrators. And that is the fundamental problem of wikipedia. Because there are just way too many OCD patients working for wikipedia who have nothing else better to do, those nerdy no-life losers spend their lifetime on reverting banned editors’ edited articles, even if they are reverting back to the vandalized page.

Here is the perfect example, what those OCD patients are doing for wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Penwhale&oldid=106705031#Hey.2C_thanks_for_reporting_me_ASSHOLE.21.21.21

They don’t care what the banned users did, they just want to revert, revert. And wikipedia foundation encourages such abusive behavior. It also gives those people a sense of power which they don’t have in real life. Further, it makes them feel good because they can’t control anyone in real life, at least they are happy that they can just abuse anyone that they dislike on wikipedia. And that is the reason why they are diagnosed as patients of obsessive-compulsive disorders.

If wikipedia doesn’t change that stupid rule, wikipedia is simply creating more and more people with wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

In real life, if someone committed a murder, s/he has to go through trials; and if s/he doesn’t agree with the judge, s/he can still go for another trial at a higher court. On wikipedia, once a person is banned by any of those OCD administrators, the person is banned for life. There is no trial, nothing. That creates lots of problems, because how can we be sure the banned user was actually “vandalizing” pages? How can we be sure that those OCD administrators actually did the right thing? There is no check and balance inside wikipedia, those OCD patients basically just bound with each other. To those idiots, they think that the world only has two kinds of people, the wikipedia administrators and those banned editors of wikipedia.

Lots of those OCD administrators are spending their time pissing people off by reverting, and they spend way too much time on studying if one of the editors is a banned editor. It gets them excited to know that a banned user is back. That is the reason why there are so many pages on wikipedia full of “criminal” names, those OCD patients are constantly adding more information about any “vandals” recent activities.

wikipedia idiots need to stop this stupid rule of banning people for lifetime, because most people were banned for the wrong reason. And even those real life criminals are given second chances once they are released from the jail. Further, many banned editors are actually well educated, and they are only trying to contribute their own knowledge. For people who have a life, they don’t have time to be wikipedia administrators, they only have time to edit a few articles once in a while.

On the other hand, many of those OCD administrators are the ones who need to be banned for lifetime, because they have no life other than wikipedia!

Wikipedia encourages multiple personality disorder, multiple fake accounts on that site!

In the last article, it was mentioned that in order to avoid OCD administrators, it is a very good idea to create new accounts often to avoid being stalked by those administrators. Well, it seems that wikipedia not only is creating more and more OCD patients, it also is encouraging people to have multiple personality disorders.

Just read this article,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOCK#Legitimate_uses_of_multiple_accounts

It has “Multiple accounts have legitimate uses.” “Some editors use multiple accounts to segregate their contributions for various reasons.”

It is certainly not a surprise. Wikipedia has some pizza delivery man as their administrator, so it won’t hurt to encourage people to have as many fake accounts as they want. After all, to be an administrator on wikipedia, no education is required.

In real life, will any government allow its citizens to have several fake IDs? Can students at schools have several user names to get on the school’s computer system? Do the public allow the politicians to have several different identities? Where else in the world that allows people to have multiple accounts? Nowhere else, but on wikipedia.

First, wikipedia creates more and more OCD patients, now it also encourages people to have multiple personality disorders. That is why that site is so popular with so many mental patients managing that site. Each and everyday, it attracts more and more mental patients eager waiting and applying to the next OCD administrators. After all, those people can’t keep a real job in real life, they are nobody in real life, but wikipedia gives them a sense of “pride” and importance that they have never achieved before.

Simple ways to avoid Obsessive-compulsive wikipedia administrators.

There are just tons and tons of wikipedia administrators who have OCD – obsessive compulsive disorder, some may have the disorder, some may have the OCD personality which is quite different than the disorder.

Anyway, in case you don’t know, once an OCD administrator is hooked on you, anything you write or edit, s/he will constantly watch you. That could cause a lot of problems, because those OCD administrators have the power to ban you, revert anything you edit, and they will call anything you write or edit as “vandalism,” revert them or delete them. And there is nothing you can do about it. And sometimes they will even go crazy, they will simply protect the article that you edit, so no one can write anything even if it is a vandalized version.

So here are some simple things to avoid those OCD patients.

Ideally, you have a dynamic IP internet connection. www.whatismyip.com, it will show your ip address, if it remains the same every time you get on the internet even after you turn off the modem, that means you don’t have dynamic IP.

1. You should edit articles without signing on a wikipedia account, so when those OCD administrators click on you IP and they can only find out all the articles that you edited on that particular day. That way, they won’t be able to revert everything you have ever edited. They can only revert the articles that you have edited with that particular IP.

Also it is hard for them to remember all the digits in the IP address, therefore, it would be hard for them to talk among other OCD administrators. Can you image them talking like this “so 280.283.28.0 is back again,” the other one will say, “oh, yea 280.283.28.2 could be the same person.”

You just don’t know what those OCD patients are capable of, when they are in the OCD mood, they will just revert everything, literally everything. Even if that means they will have to spend hours on doing that, after all, wikipedia is their social life. It doesn’t matter to them if they reverted the vandalized version or not, when they have gone crazy, they just want to release their compulsive disorder.

2. You should sign on a new account, only when you want to create a new article. And try not to use any actual words in your user name, so the OCD administrators will have a hard time to remember them.

You should never enter your email when you sign on a new account, you don’t know what they will do with your email, and with that email, they can probably search it online, and find out all the things that you have done online.

3. When you create new articles, don’t use the same user ID over and over. Create a new account after you have created a few new articles. So those OCD administrators won’t be able to track all the articles you have done, so they can’t revert everything.

There is no need to feel bad about creating new accounts, because those OCD administrators do that all the time. They have those fake accounts that are used only to piss off certain people. So when you check out the contribution lists, you will find out that those accounts have minimal activities. So you see, there is no need to feel bad about what you are doing, wikipedia has way too many OCD administrators with double, triple, even numerous accounts.

4. Try to edit any articles only once. Don’t edit, save, edit and save many times all in one day. That attracts OCD administrators. If they don’t like what they see, they will revert the article all the way back to where you started, call anything you wrote as “vandalism”, even if the thing that they reverted are the actual vandalized version. That is very typical for all the OCD administrators.

5. If unfortunately, an OCD administrators got hooked on you and the articles that you edited, just let them do whatever that satisfy their compulsions. You should just remember that article name, and wait it for a month or two. By then, the OCD administrators will find some new obsessions to deal with, and then you can come back and do whatever you want with that article. Be sure to use a new account only for that particular article that you want to edit.

6.For people who don’t have dynamic IP, one thing that you can do is to only edit articles when you are sign on with a wikipedia account. Because if you have pissed off one of the OCD administrators, they will simply ban your IP. And from then on, you won’t be able to do anything unless you change your internet provider or move to a new place with a new internet connection, or use a proxy which is a little complicated to write it in this article. Be sure to get a new user name after a while, so your entire history won’t be exposed. Because some crazy OCD administrators will actually study your entire log history, and can revert everything that you have ever written!

7. Don’t try to edit one article all at once. That way, you can avoid OCD administrators’ attention. Edit something, then wait till someone else add their things in there. That means your edition is now confirmed, then you can write something new.

8. At last, if those crazy OCD administrators actually lock the articles that you want to edit, don’t worry. Wait for a few days, then create a new account. Use a different name for that article. For example, if the original article name is “Suzy’s doll,” you can create a new article called “Doll of Suzy,” or “Suzy’s only doll,” etc. Most of the time, even if you just add a single comma, period, or some capital letters, wikipedia’s computers will consider them as new articles. Simply copy whatever you wrote in the original article, and save it. There you go, mission is accomplished. let those crazy administrators watch those original articles like some silly dogs that they are. Now your version of article is published for the whole world to see.

Be sure never to use that account again. Create another account to add another new article. So those wikipedia OCD patients won’t go after you like maniacs.

Those OCD patients are not there to edit articles, they are just there to piss people off. They would rather delete anything useful than keeping the useful things that you wrote. They get enormously “happy” when they “detect” anything “unusual” over any articles that they have been “watching.” That means they can abuse their power again. So sometimes the best way is to avoid those patients all together, just create the same article with another new name. simple and easy.

another wikipedia OCD administrator exposed

Gogo Dodo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gogo_Dodo 

It simply amazes me how many OCD administrators wikipedia has!

look at this person, s/he clearly has wikipedia addiction, and has OCD, most likely a male who has no job, no social life, therefore, he can spend all his lifetime on wikipedia.

for example,

he started on June 25th, 2007 at 06:20 – 06:47, then he got back on again at 16:40, and he ended his last message at 23:06.

that is about total of SEVEN HOURS he spent on that site alone! he is just another typical jobless, no life wikipedia obsessed OCD administrator.

sure, wikipedia is not paying him even a single penny for anything he does on there, however, for a person like him who has no job, how much is our welfare system paying for him to live like a bum? In the end, even if he just gets a job at mcdonald, at least, he is doing something good for the society. Seriously, how many people will ever read anything he wrote on there for a person like him who certainly didn’t have any good education.

Indeed, wikipedia is destroying many people’s lives one at a time!

Chinese version Wikipedia is blocked in China, but how can 30 Chinese administrators still be able to manage the site from China?

Wikipedia’s Chinese version is blocked by the Chinese government, however, 30 Chinese who are working directly inside China are able to get on this government blocked site, and manage it as “volunteers.”

That just makes everyone wonder, how can those “brave” people dare to challenge their own government’s action? why are they so “defiant?” At the same time, the rest of over one billion Chinese are blocked from using that site? mmm.

There are six people working directly from Beijing, the capital city-. Chinese government constantly blocks and closes web sites. Doesn’t it make you wonder? How come those people working right inside the government’s capital? Wikipedia is already blocked, why can’t those 30 Chinese working freely as if the government’s block doesn’t exist?

If they can bypass the government’s block so easily, why do the rest of the over 1 billion Chinese have problems of connecting to wikipedia? Ask yourself, if you are working for a site that is blocked by your own government, would you be worried? And don’t you think that police maybe listening to your conversations on the phone, checking your internet activity online?

If someone is able to get to wikipedia so easily everyday, won’t the Chinese government itself get suspicious? And maybe even send a police or two to check out who that guy is? chinese government has a very tight control over the internet. It is not news any more that chinese government have put someone in jail simply because what they wrote on a web site.

why do those 30 people have the priviledges of getting connected to wikipedia? Wikipedia people certainly know who those 30 people are. Why can’t wikipedia ask those 30 people to share their “secrets” on getting connected to wikipedia, so millions and millions of Chinese can get wikipedia freely. Why doesn’t wikipedia do that?

This just doesn’t make sense, they have 30 Chinese managing a site that billions of Chinese can’t read, what is the whole purpose of doing that? The only conclusion is that those 30 people must be working for the chinese government, or at least, they have been informed by the government to write only good things about the chinese government on wikipedia.

Then when you go read the Chinese wikipedia on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Wikipedia

It is entirely written by those Chinese administrators themselves. And how can the wikipedia calls itself neutral?!

When people try to add the truth to that article, they are immediately blocked by wikipedia Obsessive-compulsive disorder administrators.

Those OCD patients even delete people’s comments on discussion page.

wikipedia simply can’t handle the truth, they don’t want people to know the truth, either. No one can trust wikipedia at all.

Another typical OCD, internet addiction wikipedia “editor” AuburnPilot exposed.

This is so easy. Just pick a random wikipedia “editor,” check out his or her’s daily “contribution,” you will be amazed how many hours they spend on that site.

Here is another one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=AuburnPilot

user name: auburnpilot.

he started on May 9th, 2007
03:20 – 07:05

about 3 hours and 45 minutes

then once again, he is back on
14:43 – 16:54

about 2 hours 11 minutes

again

20:48 – 22:14

about 1 hour 26 minutes

He spent total of 7 hours and 24 minutes in just ONE single day!

Once again, does this person have a real life job? does this person have a social life? Are those editors all nerds, social rejects, so they can only get on wikipedia to waste their entire life away? That is just pathetic. Get a life.

Wikipedia administrator is a typical pizza delivery driver Grandmasterka . That tells us the quality of that pathetic encyclopedia.

Would microsoft, google ever hire a pizza delivery man to work on any of their web sites? Would any serious web site companies hire a pizza delivery man to manage any of their sites? Would any of the real encyclopedia company hire someone like that who has no education to write any of their articles? In real life, this person is a nobody, but online, he is transformed into someone important who doesn’t even have a good education.

Well, wikipedia is not like them at all. It doesn’t matter if you have zero education, wikipedia welcomes all. That is the “wikipedia dream.” As long as you have obsessive compuslive disorder, and you have no social life, and wikipedia is your one and only lifetime devotion, you will be the administrator! It is just that easy. Here is the perfect example of someone who has no education who finally made it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grandmasterka

According to his site when I first wrote this, he is a person born in October 4th, 1985, who just recently turned 21,  who is “a pizza delivery driver” for an “international” corporation. Does that make him an important person because it is an “international” pizza delivery company?

Conspicuously, he did not go to or was not able to finish college. And we can also conclude that he is clearly not intelligent enough to find a better job. However, he is already an editor of the “encyclopedia” which welcomes anyone who knows how to type to become editors.

Because he is an editor on that site, therefore he was able to make a future article on himself “Linden Killam.” And there is already an article about his “borderline-notable” band – “The blend.” Do you think that the

He admits himself that he is “thoroughly obsessed with wikipedia.”

He also told the world that he is “an extreme night owl,” he is on that site “very early in the morning in central time.” That means he basically have no social life during daytime. He gets online only when most people are sleeping, he sleeps when most people are out there having fun social activities.

Recently, he found his camera again, so he hopes “to get more involved in the image side of things.” yes, people, would you like to see some free pictures taken by a pizza delivery driver? So you know the reason why wikipedia’s quality is so low now.

In conclusion, let’s quote what he has on his own page:”This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.”

Next time, be sure to ask your pizza delivery man “are you an editor of wikipedia? Thank you for all your hard work, here is a buck.”

Update:  So it seems that this OCD patient finally made himself an OCD administrator after thousands and thousands of free hours that he has wasted on that site. According to his current page, he is still a pizza delivery man. And he has made over 9,000 contributions. He is 22 years old, and we have to wonder how many hours he must have spent on wikipedia in order to make that over 9000 contributions? He is truly addicted to Internet and wikipedia.

He “used to be a broadcaster,” have you ever seen anyone under 22 working as a broadcaster? He plays piano and saxophone, and he also calls himself a “music composer.” Oh, really, if he is such a musical genius, why is he still delivering pizza for a living?

Finally, at the bottom of his page, he admits “This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.”

yea, like we didn’t know already, that is pratically what every OCD administrators on wikipedia are doing!

Pizzaboy, you can continue deliever your pizzas, and we simply can’t read any articles that you have edited.