wikipedia is a web site which is ran by creepy cyber stalkers!

just look at this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse

they have everything. How many of those people listed on that page are real life criminals? However, this creepy wikipedia has everything of what a typical stalker does on the internet.

Those OCD administrators constantly put this on someone’s personal user page:”An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of..” In real life, can someone paint someone’s house with “a neighbor has expressed a concern that this person may be a gang member of ..?” No one can do that in real life, but on this creepy wikipedia site, OCD administrators can do whatever they want, they can delete some user’s front page entirely, and just put that on that person’s page.

Another example:”This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that they have used one or more accounts abusively..” Can you put someone in jail just because you suspect something, but that is what they are doing on wikipedia daily. Wikipedia has no laws, as long as you are the OCD administrators, you can make up laws daily.

On wikipedia, those psychotic administrators always assume that “I suspect, therefore you must be guilty of something.”

They even have a “counter vandalism unit” on wikipedia as if they are some kind heroic law agent!

This is getting really creepy just to think about it. Those no-life OCD administrators not only spend all their time on there pissing people off, but they are also stalking people on the internet! They are all real life stalkers! yes, that is right. They create “personal pages” for anyone they don’t like, and they name those pages as “long term abuse”, it is more like long term stalking by the OCD wikipedian administrators. On those personal pages, they have: original names, time span, ISP provider, known IPs,severity, etc. They know who those users are, what they like or dislike, their preferences,etc.

The creepiest part about it is that they even have “physical location” listed on those personal pages, sometimes, the person’s real names are also listed!

Are those banned users “hackers” or “criminals against humanity?” Did they do any harm to the society? certainly not!

Who give wikipedia the rights to expose people’s real names, and physical locations on the internet!? What are they going to do with those physical locations and names? Are they going to send some OCD administrators and stalk them in real life?! Why do they want to list someone’s real name on the internet, so they can recruit more stalkers to stalk those innocent people?!

And they even have “instructions” for future wikipedia stalkers, for example, here is one:”Revert all edits, speedy delete new articles, obtain immediate admin assistance to block sockpuppet account and monitor for numerous subsequent sockpuppets. Consider semi-protecting any articles targeted.”

Now not only they are stalking people online, they also like to vandalize wikipedia pages by “reverting all edits.” Is that what a normal sane person would do? Why do you want to revert all edits if you don’t even know if it is correct or not? Why do they want to delete all new articles, what if the new article is actually correct? Who are the people that are really vandalizing wikipedia? It is quite obvious that the psychotic OCD administrators are the ones who are vandalizing wikipedia every minute. And that is the reason why no one is using wikipedia for reference any more.

Indeed, wikipedia is becoming a haven for real life stalkers, they now have a perfect web site to express their stalking activities freely.

psychotic OCD wikipedia administrators, Stop stalking people on the internet before the police send you to the real jails!

Wikipedia is ran by bunch of clueless clowns.

I often wonder if wikipedia is ran by mentally challenged people? This one is proven to be true. Here is a perfect example.

let’s look at this OCD wikipedia administrator, “Can’t sleep, clown will eat me”, yes, that is his/her real user name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Can’t_sleep%2C_clown_will_eat_me

A clown picture was posted, it is probably himself/herself. Under the picture, it has “AHHHH IT’S GOING TO EEEAAAAT MEEE!!!!!! “

Will any serious encyclopedia company ever hire a ridiculous clown looking like a clown to be their administrator or editor? Can this person dress like a clown if he works for microsoft or google? Certainly not. So you know the quality wikipedia has.

Check out all those ridiculous wikipedia stars s/he got. It seems that wikipedia’s mentality is really only at elementary school level, those OCD administrators constantly give each other stars as if they are still in elementary schools. Wikipedia itself is a giant elementary school while obsessed with pornography.

check out those ridiculous names of those stars this clown has got.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar (meaning: pissed off lots of good editors by reverting their good contributions)
The Working Man’s Barnstar (meaning: people who are not working in real life who spend all their time as jobless wikipedia administrators)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (meaning: obsessed with wikipedia, with no real life job, spent most of free time on here)
The Barnstar of Good Humor (Is wikipedia a comedy club? now we know why we can’t take it seriously.)
The Surreal Barnstar (meaning: they spend nighttime on wikipedia as daytime, and daytime for sleeping.)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar (meaning: adamantly refuse to seek counseling for wikipedia generated OCD)
The Purple Star
The Original Barnstar
The Barnstar of Diligence
The Excellent Userpage Award
The Special Barnstar

They obviously have no imaginiation, that is why they ran out of names, that is why they have to name two stars as “original barnstar” and “special barnstar”.

So next time, when you see someone has some stars on his/her page, that means s/he is addicted. S/he must have spent a lot of time working as OCD administrators, and has pissed a lot of real editors in order to get those meaningless stars.

The fundamental serious problem of wikipedia – Banned for lifetime.

It is quite common that someone who only wants to contribute some valuable information on wikipedia, accidently s/he pissed off one of the OCD administrators. That person is banned for lifetime.

Are those banned editors “criminals?” Did they kill someone, or are they the internet terrorists? What did they do that deserve a lifetime ban?

Once that person is banned, anything s/he edits will be be reverted by those wikipedia OCD administrators. And that is the fundamental problem of wikipedia. Because there are just way too many OCD patients working for wikipedia who have nothing else better to do, those nerdy no-life losers spend their lifetime on reverting banned editors’ edited articles, even if they are reverting back to the vandalized page.

Here is the perfect example, what those OCD patients are doing for wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Penwhale&oldid=106705031#Hey.2C_thanks_for_reporting_me_ASSHOLE.21.21.21

They don’t care what the banned users did, they just want to revert, revert. And wikipedia foundation encourages such abusive behavior. It also gives those people a sense of power which they don’t have in real life. Further, it makes them feel good because they can’t control anyone in real life, at least they are happy that they can just abuse anyone that they dislike on wikipedia. And that is the reason why they are diagnosed as patients of obsessive-compulsive disorders.

If wikipedia doesn’t change that stupid rule, wikipedia is simply creating more and more people with wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

In real life, if someone committed a murder, s/he has to go through trials; and if s/he doesn’t agree with the judge, s/he can still go for another trial at a higher court. On wikipedia, once a person is banned by any of those OCD administrators, the person is banned for life. There is no trial, nothing. That creates lots of problems, because how can we be sure the banned user was actually “vandalizing” pages? How can we be sure that those OCD administrators actually did the right thing? There is no check and balance inside wikipedia, those OCD patients basically just bound with each other. To those idiots, they think that the world only has two kinds of people, the wikipedia administrators and those banned editors of wikipedia.

Lots of those OCD administrators are spending their time pissing people off by reverting, and they spend way too much time on studying if one of the editors is a banned editor. It gets them excited to know that a banned user is back. That is the reason why there are so many pages on wikipedia full of “criminal” names, those OCD patients are constantly adding more information about any “vandals” recent activities.

wikipedia idiots need to stop this stupid rule of banning people for lifetime, because most people were banned for the wrong reason. And even those real life criminals are given second chances once they are released from the jail. Further, many banned editors are actually well educated, and they are only trying to contribute their own knowledge. For people who have a life, they don’t have time to be wikipedia administrators, they only have time to edit a few articles once in a while.

On the other hand, many of those OCD administrators are the ones who need to be banned for lifetime, because they have no life other than wikipedia!

Simple ways to avoid Obsessive-compulsive wikipedia administrators.

There are just tons and tons of wikipedia administrators who have OCD – obsessive compulsive disorder, some may have the disorder, some may have the OCD personality which is quite different than the disorder.

Anyway, in case you don’t know, once an OCD administrator is hooked on you, anything you write or edit, s/he will constantly watch you. That could cause a lot of problems, because those OCD administrators have the power to ban you, revert anything you edit, and they will call anything you write or edit as “vandalism,” revert them or delete them. And there is nothing you can do about it. And sometimes they will even go crazy, they will simply protect the article that you edit, so no one can write anything even if it is a vandalized version.

So here are some simple things to avoid those OCD patients.

Ideally, you have a dynamic IP internet connection. www.whatismyip.com, it will show your ip address, if it remains the same every time you get on the internet even after you turn off the modem, that means you don’t have dynamic IP.

1. You should edit articles without signing on a wikipedia account, so when those OCD administrators click on you IP and they can only find out all the articles that you edited on that particular day. That way, they won’t be able to revert everything you have ever edited. They can only revert the articles that you have edited with that particular IP.

Also it is hard for them to remember all the digits in the IP address, therefore, it would be hard for them to talk among other OCD administrators. Can you image them talking like this “so 280.283.28.0 is back again,” the other one will say, “oh, yea 280.283.28.2 could be the same person.”

You just don’t know what those OCD patients are capable of, when they are in the OCD mood, they will just revert everything, literally everything. Even if that means they will have to spend hours on doing that, after all, wikipedia is their social life. It doesn’t matter to them if they reverted the vandalized version or not, when they have gone crazy, they just want to release their compulsive disorder.

2. You should sign on a new account, only when you want to create a new article. And try not to use any actual words in your user name, so the OCD administrators will have a hard time to remember them.

You should never enter your email when you sign on a new account, you don’t know what they will do with your email, and with that email, they can probably search it online, and find out all the things that you have done online.

3. When you create new articles, don’t use the same user ID over and over. Create a new account after you have created a few new articles. So those OCD administrators won’t be able to track all the articles you have done, so they can’t revert everything.

There is no need to feel bad about creating new accounts, because those OCD administrators do that all the time. They have those fake accounts that are used only to piss off certain people. So when you check out the contribution lists, you will find out that those accounts have minimal activities. So you see, there is no need to feel bad about what you are doing, wikipedia has way too many OCD administrators with double, triple, even numerous accounts.

4. Try to edit any articles only once. Don’t edit, save, edit and save many times all in one day. That attracts OCD administrators. If they don’t like what they see, they will revert the article all the way back to where you started, call anything you wrote as “vandalism”, even if the thing that they reverted are the actual vandalized version. That is very typical for all the OCD administrators.

5. If unfortunately, an OCD administrators got hooked on you and the articles that you edited, just let them do whatever that satisfy their compulsions. You should just remember that article name, and wait it for a month or two. By then, the OCD administrators will find some new obsessions to deal with, and then you can come back and do whatever you want with that article. Be sure to use a new account only for that particular article that you want to edit.

6.For people who don’t have dynamic IP, one thing that you can do is to only edit articles when you are sign on with a wikipedia account. Because if you have pissed off one of the OCD administrators, they will simply ban your IP. And from then on, you won’t be able to do anything unless you change your internet provider or move to a new place with a new internet connection, or use a proxy which is a little complicated to write it in this article. Be sure to get a new user name after a while, so your entire history won’t be exposed. Because some crazy OCD administrators will actually study your entire log history, and can revert everything that you have ever written!

7. Don’t try to edit one article all at once. That way, you can avoid OCD administrators’ attention. Edit something, then wait till someone else add their things in there. That means your edition is now confirmed, then you can write something new.

8. At last, if those crazy OCD administrators actually lock the articles that you want to edit, don’t worry. Wait for a few days, then create a new account. Use a different name for that article. For example, if the original article name is “Suzy’s doll,” you can create a new article called “Doll of Suzy,” or “Suzy’s only doll,” etc. Most of the time, even if you just add a single comma, period, or some capital letters, wikipedia’s computers will consider them as new articles. Simply copy whatever you wrote in the original article, and save it. There you go, mission is accomplished. let those crazy administrators watch those original articles like some silly dogs that they are. Now your version of article is published for the whole world to see.

Be sure never to use that account again. Create another account to add another new article. So those wikipedia OCD patients won’t go after you like maniacs.

Those OCD patients are not there to edit articles, they are just there to piss people off. They would rather delete anything useful than keeping the useful things that you wrote. They get enormously “happy” when they “detect” anything “unusual” over any articles that they have been “watching.” That means they can abuse their power again. So sometimes the best way is to avoid those patients all together, just create the same article with another new name. simple and easy.

Another typical OCD, internet addiction wikipedia “editor” AuburnPilot exposed.

This is so easy. Just pick a random wikipedia “editor,” check out his or her’s daily “contribution,” you will be amazed how many hours they spend on that site.

Here is another one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=AuburnPilot

user name: auburnpilot.

he started on May 9th, 2007
03:20 – 07:05

about 3 hours and 45 minutes

then once again, he is back on
14:43 – 16:54

about 2 hours 11 minutes

again

20:48 – 22:14

about 1 hour 26 minutes

He spent total of 7 hours and 24 minutes in just ONE single day!

Once again, does this person have a real life job? does this person have a social life? Are those editors all nerds, social rejects, so they can only get on wikipedia to waste their entire life away? That is just pathetic. Get a life.

Wikipedia refues to admit that it is creating more OCD patients.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:HOLIC

Wikipedia:Wikipediholic

“This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any remotely serious purpose.”

check that out, they claim that it is not for “any remotely serious purpose.”

hello, why do they still want to hide their heads in their butts? There are so many wikipedia administrators that have obsessive compulsive disorders on there, they have no real jobs. They are on that site 24/7. They spend most of their time reverting “vandalism” which are the things that they don’t like personally.

If they are really doing a “good” job, how come there are so many false, fake biographies on that site, and how come many colleges now prohibit their students to quote from that shitty site?

It just amazes me that so many administrators obviously have no social life. And more and more OCD patients are becoming wikipedia administrators. They become administrators not by editing articles, most of them become administrators by reverting “vandalism.” They should just stop calling the site as the free “encyclopedia,” they should call it free “vandalism.”

Obviously, those OCD patients who are running that site get a natural high by reverting editions, and banning people.

They are all OCD nerds in real life, on that site, they can finally live a life as if they are all heros. duh. get a life already, go find a real hobby, losers.

Wikipedia banned, a giant step for mankind.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/education/21wikipedia.html?ex=1329714000&en=156f770bd93c4fa0&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

From “New York Times”, by Noam Cohen, published on February 21st, 2007

“He figured out the problem soon enough. The obscure, though incorrect, information was from Wikipedia, the collaborative online encyclopedia, and the students had picked it up cramming for his exam.”

” the Middlebury history department notified its students this month that Wikipedia could not be cited in papers or exams, and that students could not “point to Wikipedia or any similar source that may appear in the future to escape the consequences of errors.”

“Wikipedia articles, written by hundreds of volunteers and subject to mistakes and sometimes deliberate falsehoods. Wikipedia itself has restricted the editing of some subjects, mostly because of repeated vandalism or disputes over what should be said.”

Of course, that site has full of errors. And many times, the articles have nothing, but personal opinions disguised as real “knowledge.”

Wikipedia is not forever, it has to rely on computer hardwares and electricity. However, it is causing more and more people lured into the endless editing wars, and more and more people are getting the obsessive-compulsive disorders because of the existence of wikipedia.

If wikipedia is banned, then there won’t be so many new OCD patients popping up everyday. If wikipedia is banned, all those millions of people around the world will be able to be forced to give up their useless editing hobby, and be able to use those free time for some real social life fun.

One small step for the history department, one giant step for mankind indeed.

check out this typical wikipedia generated Obsessive-compuslive disorder patient – AuburnPilot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&target=AuburnPilot

This typical wikipedia generated Obesessive-Compuslive disorder patient AuburnPilot is seriously addicted to the Internet and wikipedia. Just check out his “contribution.” For example, he got on 3-28-2007 at 01:18, ended at 09:10, that is about total of eight hours! He wasted his another eight hours of his life time “editing” an online encyclopedia.

And what was he doing for the long hours? Well, that is also a typical pattern like many of the wikipedia generated OCD patients, he spent almost all the time on reverting people’s editions, meaning, he was just there to piss other people off. And the rest of the time, he was just “talking” to other users. He was not on wikipedia to edit any articles at all. Wikipedia is a perfect site for obsessive compulsive disorder patients like him. He does not need to contribute, he is just there to fulfill his urge of expressing his serious disorder.

Anyday and anytime, wikipedia has many OCD patients who are addicted to that site, who are just wasting their life away by “editing” the free encyclopedia. As long as wikipedia exists, those people will not have a normal life. That site is their lifeline, they can’t live without it any more. They have no social life, and they have no need for food or water. Many of them probably don’t have a job, either. That is why they can spend so many free hours on there doing nothing, but reverting and reverting.

So as you can see, wikipedia generated obsessive-compuslive disorder is a real serious disease. Not many people realize that that site is like a black hole that continues to create more and more OCD patients worldwide.

Wikipedia’s administrators psychological problems.

Why do those administrators like to volunteer their time on that free “encyclopedia?” Do they not have a life? How many hours per day do they spend on that site? What do they get in return? They are not getting paid, the onlysatisfaction that they are getting is the psychological thrill. As I have said it before, doctors, lawyers, CEOs or anyone who have a busy family life certainly won’t waste their time on that pathetic site. Can you image Donald Trump or even his children spending their time volunteering for that site?

Those wikipedia administrators are nobody in real life, that is why. And has anyone checked on their mental and psychological statuses before giving them the rights of administrator? How many of them have lost control since they got the power? Let’s have a look at this perfect psychological problematic model.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&target=khoikhoi

Just check out the time this OCD patient aka administrator khoikhoi spends on this site. The only time when he is not online is the time when he is sleeping. It makes one wonder if this person actually has a real job in real life? He spends at least 4 or 5 hours once he gets on that site. And most of the time, he is reverting articles that he doesn’t like. And every revert he makes will only adds one moreenemy in his life.

Is wikipedia’s existence making him a better person, unlikely, that site is making him even more addicted to the internet. Before wikipedia, he conspicuously already have internet addiction, and he was a nobody, now he is a suddenly a somebody – an encyclopedia “editor.” He suddenly has a purpose in his life, that is to spend all his free time on that site. Wikipedia is extending his obsessive compulsive disorder forever.

This person khoikhoi truly needs help. He has internet addiction and OCD all are caused by wikipedia.

And there are many more administrators like him are very active on wikipedia, they are spending too much time on that site fighting the unnecessary editing wars with people that they don’t even know. How many of wikipedia administrators are normal, how many of them have serious, severe personality disorders? no one knows. Their odd behaviors truly demonstrate that they need some serious help.

anyone under 18 should be banned from editing wikipedia for possible wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_of_Naruto:_Shippūden

“The plot of the second part of the manga and anime series Naruto”

Yes, that is one of the article on wikipedia, it is several pages long. You would think that just one article about one cartoon is good enough. Are you surprised that there is a seperate article about a “plot” that appeared in one of the cartoon.

And there are many many more similar articles about many cartoons, articles about each inidividual characters that appeared in those thousands if not millions cartoons. How valueable are those articles? zero. Who has time to read those articles, and why does anyone who has a normal social life even care to read about every little characters that ever appeared in a animation tv show?

Yet who are those people who wrote those articles? who else, bunch of nerdy teenagers. While other cool popular teeangers are busy having sex, socializing with other people, those nerdy teenagers stay at home, watch cartoons, then get on wikipedia spend their time writing articles about those cartoon characters, and start editing wars with other nerdy OCD administrators and teeangers.

Those teenagers already have no life by staying at home. Now wikipedia gives them a false sense of pride by calling them “editors” of an online “encyclopedia.” All of sudden, those nerds become someone important. If they are not able to have any social interactions in real life, at least, they can communicate with strangers all over the world on wikipedia. It makes them feel as if they are “contributing” for the good of the society.

oh, come on, who cares to read about what they wrote about millions of the cartoon characters?

It is a waste of their life. And it creates personality disorders if those teeangers stay on wikipedia for too long. No one who has a real social life can possibly spend hours and hours on that site writing articles.

Teenagers are the group that most likely to form internet addiction. Their brains are still developing. wikipedia creates addiction and OCD especially for teenagers who are lack of self-control.

Therefore, for your own teenagers’ good mental health, all parents should ban their teenagers editing wikipedia articles. It is ideal if all parents just simply block the wikipedia access for their own good. There are plenty real reference sites online that are free and free of errors.