Wikipedia refues to admit that it is creating more OCD patients.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:HOLIC

Wikipedia:Wikipediholic

“This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any remotely serious purpose.”

check that out, they claim that it is not for “any remotely serious purpose.”

hello, why do they still want to hide their heads in their butts? There are so many wikipedia administrators that have obsessive compulsive disorders on there, they have no real jobs. They are on that site 24/7. They spend most of their time reverting “vandalism” which are the things that they don’t like personally.

If they are really doing a “good” job, how come there are so many false, fake biographies on that site, and how come many colleges now prohibit their students to quote from that shitty site?

It just amazes me that so many administrators obviously have no social life. And more and more OCD patients are becoming wikipedia administrators. They become administrators not by editing articles, most of them become administrators by reverting “vandalism.” They should just stop calling the site as the free “encyclopedia,” they should call it free “vandalism.”

Obviously, those OCD patients who are running that site get a natural high by reverting editions, and banning people.

They are all OCD nerds in real life, on that site, they can finally live a life as if they are all heros. duh. get a life already, go find a real hobby, losers.

anyone under 18 should be banned from editing wikipedia for possible wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_of_Naruto:_Shippūden

“The plot of the second part of the manga and anime series Naruto”

Yes, that is one of the article on wikipedia, it is several pages long. You would think that just one article about one cartoon is good enough. Are you surprised that there is a seperate article about a “plot” that appeared in one of the cartoon.

And there are many many more similar articles about many cartoons, articles about each inidividual characters that appeared in those thousands if not millions cartoons. How valueable are those articles? zero. Who has time to read those articles, and why does anyone who has a normal social life even care to read about every little characters that ever appeared in a animation tv show?

Yet who are those people who wrote those articles? who else, bunch of nerdy teenagers. While other cool popular teeangers are busy having sex, socializing with other people, those nerdy teenagers stay at home, watch cartoons, then get on wikipedia spend their time writing articles about those cartoon characters, and start editing wars with other nerdy OCD administrators and teeangers.

Those teenagers already have no life by staying at home. Now wikipedia gives them a false sense of pride by calling them “editors” of an online “encyclopedia.” All of sudden, those nerds become someone important. If they are not able to have any social interactions in real life, at least, they can communicate with strangers all over the world on wikipedia. It makes them feel as if they are “contributing” for the good of the society.

oh, come on, who cares to read about what they wrote about millions of the cartoon characters?

It is a waste of their life. And it creates personality disorders if those teeangers stay on wikipedia for too long. No one who has a real social life can possibly spend hours and hours on that site writing articles.

Teenagers are the group that most likely to form internet addiction. Their brains are still developing. wikipedia creates addiction and OCD especially for teenagers who are lack of self-control.

Therefore, for your own teenagers’ good mental health, all parents should ban their teenagers editing wikipedia articles. It is ideal if all parents just simply block the wikipedia access for their own good. There are plenty real reference sites online that are free and free of errors.

wikipedia is a good site for sex toys review and for pornography articles and pictures

So you know what a flashlight is, do you know what a fleshlight is?

check out this article about fleshlight, it is free and open for anyone to read, including little kids who doesn’t even know what sex is. In the previous version, it even has a real picture of the fleshlight. Somehow, it was deleted. So why do they call themselves encyclopedia, if they won’t let people post a picture of the product in the article? On the other hand, the same site has six pictures of soft and erected penis pictures!

Come to think about it, that site even have an article about penis and you can see pics of real penis soft and hard. there are not just one pic, there are total of six real pictures of real penis! wow. do you want your kids to read about that, and see what they look like in action?

Yea, it is indeed a free sex encyclopedia, you can read about reviews about sex toys, and check out real penis pictures which you can’t find in any local library books. and how about masturbation? In case you don’t know how to do it, go read that, there is a free sex instructional article about masturbation in the deguise of “science.” do you need lubricant? it tells you the purpose of using lubricant while masturbating. how cool is that.

sex toys, dirty pics, and how to masturbate, why do you need another site, just click and click, you will find what you like. parents, relax, it is an encyclopedia, so don’t worry, your kids won’t look at anything dirty and forbidden. after all, they are studying an encyclopedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleshlight
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masturbation