Wikipedia is obsessed with penis, free erect penis pictures for everyone to see!

It seems that wikipedia has a fascination with penis! yes, that is right. It is really free pornography for everyone! There is no age requirement, as long as the kids know how to type the word penis on that page, they will be able to see plenty of real life pictures of penis soft and erect! Can you imagine if those pictures were shown on TV or magazines, or textbooks, angry parents will certainly file plenty of lawsuits against whoever did that. But on wikipedia, it is open for early sex education.

Not so long ago, it even had a real picture a elephant penis! You sure can’t find that anywhere else.

Thanks to the wonderful free donors, the penis page has had plenty of free pornography pictures.

They seem to constantly update those free porn pictures almost weekly. Parents, don’t worry, wikipedia is claimed be kid-safe, what your kids can’t find on those locked sites, they can find plenty on wikipedia. I am sure that those very dedicated OCD administrators have spent a lot of time on choosing which penis pictures to be published, which erected penis pictures will be more approriate for the children. There are plenty of penis pictures, just click on history and find more. Here are some sample pictures for the whole world to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=190018404
Two new fully erected penis pictures

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=164889591
Three different fully erected real penis pictures, plus one penis with piercing

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=136875061
Two different penis pictures in color, and same black and white penis picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=123112225
One picture of a penis soft and erect, black and white penis picture, and a ampallang pierced penis (somehow, this picture didn’t last long.)

You can also find plenty free porn pictures on other related subjects, such as vagina.

Free porns by anyone, and for everyone, that is the essence of wikipedia!

Wikipedia is not a “free” “neutral encyclopedia”, it is only a site that is by the rich, for the rich.

It claims that it is a “free” “encyclopedia,” but it is a complete false claim. First of all, it does not and will never include articles such as, “Wikipedia generated Obsessive-compulsive disorder.” Second, it is “free” only to those who have money to use or owe a computer. Therefore, its editing is also not neutral, because only people who have access to computers can edit. So the articles on that site is very biased due to the fact it is edited only by mostly people who are not poor, who have spare time to waste.

That is true especially for those teenagers or younger. A child of parents who work at Mcdonald’s, etc certainly does not have the money to owe a computer or to pay for the high speed internet. When a seven-years-old rich kid may owe several computers, s/he certainly can have time and resources to edit the “encyclopedia,” that is why we see that there are so many articles about cartoon characters, plots, etc. Some poor kids in many other countries have never used computers even once.

Therefore, it is a solid fact that articles and opinions that wikipedia have represent mostly rich people’s points and views. Even if they may have articles that are about poor people, those articles certainly won’t be neutral, because they are written by the rich people who have free time to waste, who owe computers and who can pay for high speed Internet.  Take “US history” for an example, if it is written by a native American, it would be an entirely different view. It would put more emphasis on the brutal savage killings that white european men had done to the native Americans.

The pictures that are uploaded will never reflect the poor people, those pics are taken by rich people who have leisure time and who can buy digital cameras. Even for those wikipedia generated OCD patients, they can spend hours on there, because they don’t need to work so many hours a day, and they don’t have to worry about where to get the money for the rent, food, etc.

After all, most people around the world are not rich, many have no computers or digital cameras. Therefore, wikipedia should stop calling itself “free” and “encyclopedia,” it is a site that is operated by the rich.

anyone under 18 should be banned from editing wikipedia for possible wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plot_of_Naruto:_Shippūden

“The plot of the second part of the manga and anime series Naruto”

Yes, that is one of the article on wikipedia, it is several pages long. You would think that just one article about one cartoon is good enough. Are you surprised that there is a seperate article about a “plot” that appeared in one of the cartoon.

And there are many many more similar articles about many cartoons, articles about each inidividual characters that appeared in those thousands if not millions cartoons. How valueable are those articles? zero. Who has time to read those articles, and why does anyone who has a normal social life even care to read about every little characters that ever appeared in a animation tv show?

Yet who are those people who wrote those articles? who else, bunch of nerdy teenagers. While other cool popular teeangers are busy having sex, socializing with other people, those nerdy teenagers stay at home, watch cartoons, then get on wikipedia spend their time writing articles about those cartoon characters, and start editing wars with other nerdy OCD administrators and teeangers.

Those teenagers already have no life by staying at home. Now wikipedia gives them a false sense of pride by calling them “editors” of an online “encyclopedia.” All of sudden, those nerds become someone important. If they are not able to have any social interactions in real life, at least, they can communicate with strangers all over the world on wikipedia. It makes them feel as if they are “contributing” for the good of the society.

oh, come on, who cares to read about what they wrote about millions of the cartoon characters?

It is a waste of their life. And it creates personality disorders if those teeangers stay on wikipedia for too long. No one who has a real social life can possibly spend hours and hours on that site writing articles.

Teenagers are the group that most likely to form internet addiction. Their brains are still developing. wikipedia creates addiction and OCD especially for teenagers who are lack of self-control.

Therefore, for your own teenagers’ good mental health, all parents should ban their teenagers editing wikipedia articles. It is ideal if all parents just simply block the wikipedia access for their own good. There are plenty real reference sites online that are free and free of errors.