wikipedia is a web site which is ran by creepy cyber stalkers!

just look at this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse

they have everything. How many of those people listed on that page are real life criminals? However, this creepy wikipedia has everything of what a typical stalker does on the internet.

Those OCD administrators constantly put this on someone’s personal user page:”An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of..” In real life, can someone paint someone’s house with “a neighbor has expressed a concern that this person may be a gang member of ..?” No one can do that in real life, but on this creepy wikipedia site, OCD administrators can do whatever they want, they can delete some user’s front page entirely, and just put that on that person’s page.

Another example:”This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that they have used one or more accounts abusively..” Can you put someone in jail just because you suspect something, but that is what they are doing on wikipedia daily. Wikipedia has no laws, as long as you are the OCD administrators, you can make up laws daily.

On wikipedia, those psychotic administrators always assume that “I suspect, therefore you must be guilty of something.”

They even have a “counter vandalism unit” on wikipedia as if they are some kind heroic law agent!

This is getting really creepy just to think about it. Those no-life OCD administrators not only spend all their time on there pissing people off, but they are also stalking people on the internet! They are all real life stalkers! yes, that is right. They create “personal pages” for anyone they don’t like, and they name those pages as “long term abuse”, it is more like long term stalking by the OCD wikipedian administrators. On those personal pages, they have: original names, time span, ISP provider, known IPs,severity, etc. They know who those users are, what they like or dislike, their preferences,etc.

The creepiest part about it is that they even have “physical location” listed on those personal pages, sometimes, the person’s real names are also listed!

Are those banned users “hackers” or “criminals against humanity?” Did they do any harm to the society? certainly not!

Who give wikipedia the rights to expose people’s real names, and physical locations on the internet!? What are they going to do with those physical locations and names? Are they going to send some OCD administrators and stalk them in real life?! Why do they want to list someone’s real name on the internet, so they can recruit more stalkers to stalk those innocent people?!

And they even have “instructions” for future wikipedia stalkers, for example, here is one:”Revert all edits, speedy delete new articles, obtain immediate admin assistance to block sockpuppet account and monitor for numerous subsequent sockpuppets. Consider semi-protecting any articles targeted.”

Now not only they are stalking people online, they also like to vandalize wikipedia pages by “reverting all edits.” Is that what a normal sane person would do? Why do you want to revert all edits if you don’t even know if it is correct or not? Why do they want to delete all new articles, what if the new article is actually correct? Who are the people that are really vandalizing wikipedia? It is quite obvious that the psychotic OCD administrators are the ones who are vandalizing wikipedia every minute. And that is the reason why no one is using wikipedia for reference any more.

Indeed, wikipedia is becoming a haven for real life stalkers, they now have a perfect web site to express their stalking activities freely.

psychotic OCD wikipedia administrators, Stop stalking people on the internet before the police send you to the real jails!

Wikipedia is ran by bunch of clueless clowns.

I often wonder if wikipedia is ran by mentally challenged people? This one is proven to be true. Here is a perfect example.

let’s look at this OCD wikipedia administrator, “Can’t sleep, clown will eat me”, yes, that is his/her real user name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Can’t_sleep%2C_clown_will_eat_me

A clown picture was posted, it is probably himself/herself. Under the picture, it has “AHHHH IT’S GOING TO EEEAAAAT MEEE!!!!!! “

Will any serious encyclopedia company ever hire a ridiculous clown looking like a clown to be their administrator or editor? Can this person dress like a clown if he works for microsoft or google? Certainly not. So you know the quality wikipedia has.

Check out all those ridiculous wikipedia stars s/he got. It seems that wikipedia’s mentality is really only at elementary school level, those OCD administrators constantly give each other stars as if they are still in elementary schools. Wikipedia itself is a giant elementary school while obsessed with pornography.

check out those ridiculous names of those stars this clown has got.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar (meaning: pissed off lots of good editors by reverting their good contributions)
The Working Man’s Barnstar (meaning: people who are not working in real life who spend all their time as jobless wikipedia administrators)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (meaning: obsessed with wikipedia, with no real life job, spent most of free time on here)
The Barnstar of Good Humor (Is wikipedia a comedy club? now we know why we can’t take it seriously.)
The Surreal Barnstar (meaning: they spend nighttime on wikipedia as daytime, and daytime for sleeping.)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar (meaning: adamantly refuse to seek counseling for wikipedia generated OCD)
The Purple Star
The Original Barnstar
The Barnstar of Diligence
The Excellent Userpage Award
The Special Barnstar

They obviously have no imaginiation, that is why they ran out of names, that is why they have to name two stars as “original barnstar” and “special barnstar”.

So next time, when you see someone has some stars on his/her page, that means s/he is addicted. S/he must have spent a lot of time working as OCD administrators, and has pissed a lot of real editors in order to get those meaningless stars.

Wikipedia is obsessed with penis, free erect penis pictures for everyone to see!

It seems that wikipedia has a fascination with penis! yes, that is right. It is really free pornography for everyone! There is no age requirement, as long as the kids know how to type the word penis on that page, they will be able to see plenty of real life pictures of penis soft and erect! Can you imagine if those pictures were shown on TV or magazines, or textbooks, angry parents will certainly file plenty of lawsuits against whoever did that. But on wikipedia, it is open for early sex education.

Not so long ago, it even had a real picture a elephant penis! You sure can’t find that anywhere else.

Thanks to the wonderful free donors, the penis page has had plenty of free pornography pictures.

They seem to constantly update those free porn pictures almost weekly. Parents, don’t worry, wikipedia is claimed be kid-safe, what your kids can’t find on those locked sites, they can find plenty on wikipedia. I am sure that those very dedicated OCD administrators have spent a lot of time on choosing which penis pictures to be published, which erected penis pictures will be more approriate for the children. There are plenty of penis pictures, just click on history and find more. Here are some sample pictures for the whole world to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=190018404
Two new fully erected penis pictures

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=164889591
Three different fully erected real penis pictures, plus one penis with piercing

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=136875061
Two different penis pictures in color, and same black and white penis picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=123112225
One picture of a penis soft and erect, black and white penis picture, and a ampallang pierced penis (somehow, this picture didn’t last long.)

You can also find plenty free porn pictures on other related subjects, such as vagina.

Free porns by anyone, and for everyone, that is the essence of wikipedia!

Wikipedia is officially full of errors. No one should use it any more.

Who else is using wikipedia as reference these days, hardly anyone. Now it is just a site where losers and OCD administrators have crazy times together. Each day, it creates more and more wikipedia administrators with Obsessive-compulsive disorder. It is running 24 hours a day, so they feel the need to get on there as often as they can. Seriously, if they are so devoted, why don’t they quit their minimum wage jobs and go to africa, and help those people there? That is much better than wasting electricity and causing more ozone damage to the earth.

As it attracts more and more OCD patients, that site’s quality is deteriorating fast! There is probably no courts will use anything people find on wikipedia as solid evidence now.

For example, check out the phrase “mammillary body”, the function

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammillary_body 

9 October 2007, “Function is unknown; may be involved in memory.”
15 October 2007, “Relay station for the reflexes related to the sense of smell.”
26 November 2007, “They are involved with the processing of recognition memory,”

In such a short time, there were three different answers. Neuroscience is not a new subject that just appeared yesterday. Whatever mammillary body’s function is, you should be able to find it in a real neuroscience book. Did the neuroscientists just make a big discovery on October 15th, that is why its function changed from unknown to “sense of smell?!” Then did some genius discover the real function on November 26th, so its function changed to recognition memory?!

Its function was officially “related to sense of smell” for more than 40 days on wikipedia. Didn’t those OCD administrators claim that wikipedia is as accurate as those real encyclopedias, since they spend 24 hours a day on it? Where are the experts that are editing wikipedia? mm, guess they all got pissed off or banned by those Obsessive-compulsive disorder administrators. Only people who know nothing about neuroscience are editing those serious scientific articles. You, too, can make an important discovery now, if you go change its function to “male erection”. Certainly, there is no requirement for educational background check, a six-year-old kid can edit this article if s/he wants to.

What if you were using wikipedia for your serious academic study or exam, use it to write a serious academic paper, then you are screwed.

That is the reason why no one is using it for serious reference any more, because you never know the thing you read on there is correct or wrong. So next time, save yourself some time, read something else other than wikipedia for reference.

wow, those OCD wikipedia administrators/patients really have nothing else better to do.

I just found out that they even have discussion pages for those no-life losers to discuss about the randomly banned users. They can talk about whether those banned users are coming back with new user names, IP, which articles they are editing, etc. No wonder wikipedia is causing so many OCD wiki administrators, those OCD patients really can spend many hours on that.

As I have said before, no editor is a criminal, they got banned by those OCD wikipedia administrators very randomly. Those editors never got a chance to defend for themselves, those OCD wikipedia patients just like to abuse their powers to ban anyone they don’t like, there is no trial or panel meetings, etc.

Those OCD wikipedia administrator-losers have that fake sense of power. In real life, if one wants to become a judge, s/he has to go through many years of training and education. Even for a person who wants to become a police officer, s/he has to go through many hours of training. With all of that, those people will be judted by certain laws, and if they did anything wrong, there are laws to judge them. However, on wikipedia, there is no training, or laws. Those OCD losers claim themselves to be the laws and the rulers of that crazy kingdom. There is no training sessions for anyone who wants to become another OCD administrators. As long as they are obessed with that site, and have no real job in real life, they are most likely to be accepted. And there is no appeal process for any of the banned editors, once they are banned, they are banned forever, even if they are Einstein!

Are those banned users hard core criminals? Certainly not, many started with a good intention to help to edit those articles, to contribute their knowledge. On the way of doing that, they unfortunately attracted those OCD administrators, eventually they got banned for no good reasons at all. That certainly make those OCD patients happier, because now they have more people to discuss, to “investigate,” those OCD lives can only get better if they can ban more editors.

It is just really funny to see those OCD losers to add every suspicious article or IP to those banned users’ pages, as if they are helping FBI to fight some real life crimes or something. After all, there is nothing wrong if a person just want to edit an article. No one cares to read those pages other than the OCD wikipedia administrators who have no life in real life.

The wikipedia OCD losers must have a lot of fun, because they are nobody in real life, now they can “contribute” their boring lifetime for an “important” project. Most of them are not really editing articles, they are just there to piss people off.

It must give those OCD nerds great pleasure by spending hours and hours, trying to figure out if a certain IP address is used by a banned user, or if a new name or a new article edition is from one of the banned users. And there are plenty of discussion pages for those losers to discuss, they will literally crash if one day wikipedia stops functioning.

What will those losers do then? All of sudden, those losers will have total mental breakdown for sure. Then the government has to hire free psychologists for those losers, because most of those losers can’t afford to pay for counseling which they really badly need even right now!

They are reading every article on here,but it must piss them off, because they can’t delete any of them by calling them “vandalism”, they can’t ban this account, either. They certainly wish that they can take over every sites that are against wikipedia, but they have no money to buy any of them, ’cause most of the OCD patients can not contribute any money, the only thing they can contribute to wikipedai is their entire boring lives.

More and more places, such as universities, colleges, news media, etc, are banning their people using wikipedia now. It is a matter of fact before the world realizes that wikipedia is nothing but a site full of OCD nerds.

How to act like a professional on wikipedia?

We all know there are plenty OCD patients that are managing the wikipedia site, they constantly piss people off by reverting and deleting other people’s contribution.

So how can you fight back? This is quite easy, just act like one of them, here is how.

1. When you want to revert what those idiots deleted, do not use your regular user name on there, always use an annoymous IP address.

2. Always enter the following on “Edit summary”, you can enter all, or just one or two: “personal attack, POV, unsourced POV, revert vandalism, revert repeated vandalism.”

3. If they give you a warning, ask you to stop “vandalizing” the articles, this is also easy to do. First, you ignore their warning. Second, you should just copy whatever they wrote to you without their signature part, and paste that to their discussion page, and be sure to sign with your own user name or IP.

That way you will make those OCD patients look bad, and make your own edition the correct one, because after all, they are vandalizing the page, and you are doing good things by reverting them back.

The fundamental serious problem of wikipedia – Banned for lifetime.

It is quite common that someone who only wants to contribute some valuable information on wikipedia, accidently s/he pissed off one of the OCD administrators. That person is banned for lifetime.

Are those banned editors “criminals?” Did they kill someone, or are they the internet terrorists? What did they do that deserve a lifetime ban?

Once that person is banned, anything s/he edits will be be reverted by those wikipedia OCD administrators. And that is the fundamental problem of wikipedia. Because there are just way too many OCD patients working for wikipedia who have nothing else better to do, those nerdy no-life losers spend their lifetime on reverting banned editors’ edited articles, even if they are reverting back to the vandalized page.

Here is the perfect example, what those OCD patients are doing for wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Penwhale&oldid=106705031#Hey.2C_thanks_for_reporting_me_ASSHOLE.21.21.21

They don’t care what the banned users did, they just want to revert, revert. And wikipedia foundation encourages such abusive behavior. It also gives those people a sense of power which they don’t have in real life. Further, it makes them feel good because they can’t control anyone in real life, at least they are happy that they can just abuse anyone that they dislike on wikipedia. And that is the reason why they are diagnosed as patients of obsessive-compulsive disorders.

If wikipedia doesn’t change that stupid rule, wikipedia is simply creating more and more people with wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

In real life, if someone committed a murder, s/he has to go through trials; and if s/he doesn’t agree with the judge, s/he can still go for another trial at a higher court. On wikipedia, once a person is banned by any of those OCD administrators, the person is banned for life. There is no trial, nothing. That creates lots of problems, because how can we be sure the banned user was actually “vandalizing” pages? How can we be sure that those OCD administrators actually did the right thing? There is no check and balance inside wikipedia, those OCD patients basically just bound with each other. To those idiots, they think that the world only has two kinds of people, the wikipedia administrators and those banned editors of wikipedia.

Lots of those OCD administrators are spending their time pissing people off by reverting, and they spend way too much time on studying if one of the editors is a banned editor. It gets them excited to know that a banned user is back. That is the reason why there are so many pages on wikipedia full of “criminal” names, those OCD patients are constantly adding more information about any “vandals” recent activities.

wikipedia idiots need to stop this stupid rule of banning people for lifetime, because most people were banned for the wrong reason. And even those real life criminals are given second chances once they are released from the jail. Further, many banned editors are actually well educated, and they are only trying to contribute their own knowledge. For people who have a life, they don’t have time to be wikipedia administrators, they only have time to edit a few articles once in a while.

On the other hand, many of those OCD administrators are the ones who need to be banned for lifetime, because they have no life other than wikipedia!

Wikipedia encourages multiple personality disorder, multiple fake accounts on that site!

In the last article, it was mentioned that in order to avoid OCD administrators, it is a very good idea to create new accounts often to avoid being stalked by those administrators. Well, it seems that wikipedia not only is creating more and more OCD patients, it also is encouraging people to have multiple personality disorders.

Just read this article,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOCK#Legitimate_uses_of_multiple_accounts

It has “Multiple accounts have legitimate uses.” “Some editors use multiple accounts to segregate their contributions for various reasons.”

It is certainly not a surprise. Wikipedia has some pizza delivery man as their administrator, so it won’t hurt to encourage people to have as many fake accounts as they want. After all, to be an administrator on wikipedia, no education is required.

In real life, will any government allow its citizens to have several fake IDs? Can students at schools have several user names to get on the school’s computer system? Do the public allow the politicians to have several different identities? Where else in the world that allows people to have multiple accounts? Nowhere else, but on wikipedia.

First, wikipedia creates more and more OCD patients, now it also encourages people to have multiple personality disorders. That is why that site is so popular with so many mental patients managing that site. Each and everyday, it attracts more and more mental patients eager waiting and applying to the next OCD administrators. After all, those people can’t keep a real job in real life, they are nobody in real life, but wikipedia gives them a sense of “pride” and importance that they have never achieved before.