wikipedia is a web site which is ran by creepy cyber stalkers!

April 9, 2008

just look at this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long_term_abuse

they have everything. How many of those people listed on that page are real life criminals? However, this creepy wikipedia has everything of what a typical stalker does on the internet.

Those OCD administrators constantly put this on someone’s personal user page:”An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of..” In real life, can someone paint someone’s house with “a neighbor has expressed a concern that this person may be a gang member of ..?” No one can do that in real life, but on this creepy wikipedia site, OCD administrators can do whatever they want, they can delete some user’s front page entirely, and just put that on that person’s page.

Another example:”This user has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that they have used one or more accounts abusively..” Can you put someone in jail just because you suspect something, but that is what they are doing on wikipedia daily. Wikipedia has no laws, as long as you are the OCD administrators, you can make up laws daily.

On wikipedia, those psychotic administrators always assume that “I suspect, therefore you must be guilty of something.”

They even have a “counter vandalism unit” on wikipedia as if they are some kind heroic law agent!

This is getting really creepy just to think about it. Those no-life OCD administrators not only spend all their time on there pissing people off, but they are also stalking people on the internet! They are all real life stalkers! yes, that is right. They create “personal pages” for anyone they don’t like, and they name those pages as “long term abuse”, it is more like long term stalking by the OCD wikipedian administrators. On those personal pages, they have: original names, time span, ISP provider, known IPs,severity, etc. They know who those users are, what they like or dislike, their preferences,etc.

The creepiest part about it is that they even have “physical location” listed on those personal pages, sometimes, the person’s real names are also listed!

Are those banned users “hackers” or “criminals against humanity?” Did they do any harm to the society? certainly not!

Who give wikipedia the rights to expose people’s real names, and physical locations on the internet!? What are they going to do with those physical locations and names? Are they going to send some OCD administrators and stalk them in real life?! Why do they want to list someone’s real name on the internet, so they can recruit more stalkers to stalk those innocent people?!

And they even have “instructions” for future wikipedia stalkers, for example, here is one:”Revert all edits, speedy delete new articles, obtain immediate admin assistance to block sockpuppet account and monitor for numerous subsequent sockpuppets. Consider semi-protecting any articles targeted.”

Now not only they are stalking people online, they also like to vandalize wikipedia pages by “reverting all edits.” Is that what a normal sane person would do? Why do you want to revert all edits if you don’t even know if it is correct or not? Why do they want to delete all new articles, what if the new article is actually correct? Who are the people that are really vandalizing wikipedia? It is quite obvious that the psychotic OCD administrators are the ones who are vandalizing wikipedia every minute. And that is the reason why no one is using wikipedia for reference any more.

Indeed, wikipedia is becoming a haven for real life stalkers, they now have a perfect web site to express their stalking activities freely.

psychotic OCD wikipedia administrators, Stop stalking people on the internet before the police send you to the real jails!


Wikipedia is obsessed with penis, free erect penis pictures for everyone to see!

March 6, 2008

It seems that wikipedia has a fascination with penis! yes, that is right. It is really free pornography for everyone! There is no age requirement, as long as the kids know how to type the word penis on that page, they will be able to see plenty of real life pictures of penis soft and erect! Can you imagine if those pictures were shown on TV or magazines, or textbooks, angry parents will certainly file plenty of lawsuits against whoever did that. But on wikipedia, it is open for early sex education.

Not so long ago, it even had a real picture a elephant penis! You sure can’t find that anywhere else.

Thanks to the wonderful free donors, the penis page has had plenty of free pornography pictures.

They seem to constantly update those free porn pictures almost weekly. Parents, don’t worry, wikipedia is claimed be kid-safe, what your kids can’t find on those locked sites, they can find plenty on wikipedia. I am sure that those very dedicated OCD administrators have spent a lot of time on choosing which penis pictures to be published, which erected penis pictures will be more approriate for the children. There are plenty of penis pictures, just click on history and find more. Here are some sample pictures for the whole world to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=190018404
Two new fully erected penis pictures

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=164889591
Three different fully erected real penis pictures, plus one penis with piercing

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=136875061
Two different penis pictures in color, and same black and white penis picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=123112225
One picture of a penis soft and erect, black and white penis picture, and a ampallang pierced penis (somehow, this picture didn’t last long.)

You can also find plenty free porn pictures on other related subjects, such as vagina.

Free porns by anyone, and for everyone, that is the essence of wikipedia!


Wikipedia is officially full of errors. No one should use it any more.

March 6, 2008

Who else is using wikipedia as reference these days, hardly anyone. Now it is just a site where losers and OCD administrators have crazy times together. Each day, it creates more and more wikipedia administrators with Obsessive-compulsive disorder. It is running 24 hours a day, so they feel the need to get on there as often as they can. Seriously, if they are so devoted, why don’t they quit their minimum wage jobs and go to africa, and help those people there? That is much better than wasting electricity and causing more ozone damage to the earth.

As it attracts more and more OCD patients, that site’s quality is deteriorating fast! There is probably no courts will use anything people find on wikipedia as solid evidence now.

For example, check out the phrase “mammillary body”, the function

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammillary_body 

9 October 2007, “Function is unknown; may be involved in memory.”
15 October 2007, “Relay station for the reflexes related to the sense of smell.”
26 November 2007, “They are involved with the processing of recognition memory,”

In such a short time, there were three different answers. Neuroscience is not a new subject that just appeared yesterday. Whatever mammillary body’s function is, you should be able to find it in a real neuroscience book. Did the neuroscientists just make a big discovery on October 15th, that is why its function changed from unknown to “sense of smell?!” Then did some genius discover the real function on November 26th, so its function changed to recognition memory?!

Its function was officially “related to sense of smell” for more than 40 days on wikipedia. Didn’t those OCD administrators claim that wikipedia is as accurate as those real encyclopedias, since they spend 24 hours a day on it? Where are the experts that are editing wikipedia? mm, guess they all got pissed off or banned by those Obsessive-compulsive disorder administrators. Only people who know nothing about neuroscience are editing those serious scientific articles. You, too, can make an important discovery now, if you go change its function to “male erection”. Certainly, there is no requirement for educational background check, a six-year-old kid can edit this article if s/he wants to.

What if you were using wikipedia for your serious academic study or exam, use it to write a serious academic paper, then you are screwed.

That is the reason why no one is using it for serious reference any more, because you never know the thing you read on there is correct or wrong. So next time, save yourself some time, read something else other than wikipedia for reference.


How to act like a professional on wikipedia?

January 7, 2008

We all know there are plenty OCD patients that are managing the wikipedia site, they constantly piss people off by reverting and deleting other people’s contribution.

So how can you fight back? This is quite easy, just act like one of them, here is how.

1. When you want to revert what those idiots deleted, do not use your regular user name on there, always use an annoymous IP address.

2. Always enter the following on “Edit summary”, you can enter all, or just one or two: “personal attack, POV, unsourced POV, revert vandalism, revert repeated vandalism.”

3. If they give you a warning, ask you to stop “vandalizing” the articles, this is also easy to do. First, you ignore their warning. Second, you should just copy whatever they wrote to you without their signature part, and paste that to their discussion page, and be sure to sign with your own user name or IP.

That way you will make those OCD patients look bad, and make your own edition the correct one, because after all, they are vandalizing the page, and you are doing good things by reverting them back.


Wikipedia encourages multiple personality disorder, multiple fake accounts on that site!

September 14, 2007

In the last article, it was mentioned that in order to avoid OCD administrators, it is a very good idea to create new accounts often to avoid being stalked by those administrators. Well, it seems that wikipedia not only is creating more and more OCD patients, it also is encouraging people to have multiple personality disorders.

Just read this article,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOCK#Legitimate_uses_of_multiple_accounts

It has “Multiple accounts have legitimate uses.” “Some editors use multiple accounts to segregate their contributions for various reasons.”

It is certainly not a surprise. Wikipedia has some pizza delivery man as their administrator, so it won’t hurt to encourage people to have as many fake accounts as they want. After all, to be an administrator on wikipedia, no education is required.

In real life, will any government allow its citizens to have several fake IDs? Can students at schools have several user names to get on the school’s computer system? Do the public allow the politicians to have several different identities? Where else in the world that allows people to have multiple accounts? Nowhere else, but on wikipedia.

First, wikipedia creates more and more OCD patients, now it also encourages people to have multiple personality disorders. That is why that site is so popular with so many mental patients managing that site. Each and everyday, it attracts more and more mental patients eager waiting and applying to the next OCD administrators. After all, those people can’t keep a real job in real life, they are nobody in real life, but wikipedia gives them a sense of “pride” and importance that they have never achieved before.


Simple ways to avoid Obsessive-compulsive wikipedia administrators.

August 28, 2007

There are just tons and tons of wikipedia administrators who have OCD – obsessive compulsive disorder, some may have the disorder, some may have the OCD personality which is quite different than the disorder.

Anyway, in case you don’t know, once an OCD administrator is hooked on you, anything you write or edit, s/he will constantly watch you. That could cause a lot of problems, because those OCD administrators have the power to ban you, revert anything you edit, and they will call anything you write or edit as “vandalism,” revert them or delete them. And there is nothing you can do about it. And sometimes they will even go crazy, they will simply protect the article that you edit, so no one can write anything even if it is a vandalized version.

So here are some simple things to avoid those OCD patients.

Ideally, you have a dynamic IP internet connection. www.whatismyip.com, it will show your ip address, if it remains the same every time you get on the internet even after you turn off the modem, that means you don’t have dynamic IP.

1. You should edit articles without signing on a wikipedia account, so when those OCD administrators click on you IP and they can only find out all the articles that you edited on that particular day. That way, they won’t be able to revert everything you have ever edited. They can only revert the articles that you have edited with that particular IP.

Also it is hard for them to remember all the digits in the IP address, therefore, it would be hard for them to talk among other OCD administrators. Can you image them talking like this “so 280.283.28.0 is back again,” the other one will say, “oh, yea 280.283.28.2 could be the same person.”

You just don’t know what those OCD patients are capable of, when they are in the OCD mood, they will just revert everything, literally everything. Even if that means they will have to spend hours on doing that, after all, wikipedia is their social life. It doesn’t matter to them if they reverted the vandalized version or not, when they have gone crazy, they just want to release their compulsive disorder.

2. You should sign on a new account, only when you want to create a new article. And try not to use any actual words in your user name, so the OCD administrators will have a hard time to remember them.

You should never enter your email when you sign on a new account, you don’t know what they will do with your email, and with that email, they can probably search it online, and find out all the things that you have done online.

3. When you create new articles, don’t use the same user ID over and over. Create a new account after you have created a few new articles. So those OCD administrators won’t be able to track all the articles you have done, so they can’t revert everything.

There is no need to feel bad about creating new accounts, because those OCD administrators do that all the time. They have those fake accounts that are used only to piss off certain people. So when you check out the contribution lists, you will find out that those accounts have minimal activities. So you see, there is no need to feel bad about what you are doing, wikipedia has way too many OCD administrators with double, triple, even numerous accounts.

4. Try to edit any articles only once. Don’t edit, save, edit and save many times all in one day. That attracts OCD administrators. If they don’t like what they see, they will revert the article all the way back to where you started, call anything you wrote as “vandalism”, even if the thing that they reverted are the actual vandalized version. That is very typical for all the OCD administrators.

5. If unfortunately, an OCD administrators got hooked on you and the articles that you edited, just let them do whatever that satisfy their compulsions. You should just remember that article name, and wait it for a month or two. By then, the OCD administrators will find some new obsessions to deal with, and then you can come back and do whatever you want with that article. Be sure to use a new account only for that particular article that you want to edit.

6.For people who don’t have dynamic IP, one thing that you can do is to only edit articles when you are sign on with a wikipedia account. Because if you have pissed off one of the OCD administrators, they will simply ban your IP. And from then on, you won’t be able to do anything unless you change your internet provider or move to a new place with a new internet connection, or use a proxy which is a little complicated to write it in this article. Be sure to get a new user name after a while, so your entire history won’t be exposed. Because some crazy OCD administrators will actually study your entire log history, and can revert everything that you have ever written!

7. Don’t try to edit one article all at once. That way, you can avoid OCD administrators’ attention. Edit something, then wait till someone else add their things in there. That means your edition is now confirmed, then you can write something new.

8. At last, if those crazy OCD administrators actually lock the articles that you want to edit, don’t worry. Wait for a few days, then create a new account. Use a different name for that article. For example, if the original article name is “Suzy’s doll,” you can create a new article called “Doll of Suzy,” or “Suzy’s only doll,” etc. Most of the time, even if you just add a single comma, period, or some capital letters, wikipedia’s computers will consider them as new articles. Simply copy whatever you wrote in the original article, and save it. There you go, mission is accomplished. let those crazy administrators watch those original articles like some silly dogs that they are. Now your version of article is published for the whole world to see.

Be sure never to use that account again. Create another account to add another new article. So those wikipedia OCD patients won’t go after you like maniacs.

Those OCD patients are not there to edit articles, they are just there to piss people off. They would rather delete anything useful than keeping the useful things that you wrote. They get enormously “happy” when they “detect” anything “unusual” over any articles that they have been “watching.” That means they can abuse their power again. So sometimes the best way is to avoid those patients all together, just create the same article with another new name. simple and easy.


another wikipedia OCD administrator exposed

June 26, 2007

Gogo Dodo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gogo_Dodo 

It simply amazes me how many OCD administrators wikipedia has!

look at this person, s/he clearly has wikipedia addiction, and has OCD, most likely a male who has no job, no social life, therefore, he can spend all his lifetime on wikipedia.

for example,

he started on June 25th, 2007 at 06:20 – 06:47, then he got back on again at 16:40, and he ended his last message at 23:06.

that is about total of SEVEN HOURS he spent on that site alone! he is just another typical jobless, no life wikipedia obsessed OCD administrator.

sure, wikipedia is not paying him even a single penny for anything he does on there, however, for a person like him who has no job, how much is our welfare system paying for him to live like a bum? In the end, even if he just gets a job at mcdonald, at least, he is doing something good for the society. Seriously, how many people will ever read anything he wrote on there for a person like him who certainly didn’t have any good education.

Indeed, wikipedia is destroying many people’s lives one at a time!


Chinese version Wikipedia is blocked in China, but how can 30 Chinese administrators still be able to manage the site from China?

May 13, 2007

Wikipedia’s Chinese version is blocked by the Chinese government, however, 30 Chinese who are working directly inside China are able to get on this government blocked site, and manage it as “volunteers.”

That just makes everyone wonder, how can those “brave” people dare to challenge their own government’s action? why are they so “defiant?” At the same time, the rest of over one billion Chinese are blocked from using that site? mmm.

There are six people working directly from Beijing, the capital city-. Chinese government constantly blocks and closes web sites. Doesn’t it make you wonder? How come those people working right inside the government’s capital? Wikipedia is already blocked, why can’t those 30 Chinese working freely as if the government’s block doesn’t exist?

If they can bypass the government’s block so easily, why do the rest of the over 1 billion Chinese have problems of connecting to wikipedia? Ask yourself, if you are working for a site that is blocked by your own government, would you be worried? And don’t you think that police maybe listening to your conversations on the phone, checking your internet activity online?

If someone is able to get to wikipedia so easily everyday, won’t the Chinese government itself get suspicious? And maybe even send a police or two to check out who that guy is? chinese government has a very tight control over the internet. It is not news any more that chinese government have put someone in jail simply because what they wrote on a web site.

why do those 30 people have the priviledges of getting connected to wikipedia? Wikipedia people certainly know who those 30 people are. Why can’t wikipedia ask those 30 people to share their “secrets” on getting connected to wikipedia, so millions and millions of Chinese can get wikipedia freely. Why doesn’t wikipedia do that?

This just doesn’t make sense, they have 30 Chinese managing a site that billions of Chinese can’t read, what is the whole purpose of doing that? The only conclusion is that those 30 people must be working for the chinese government, or at least, they have been informed by the government to write only good things about the chinese government on wikipedia.

Then when you go read the Chinese wikipedia on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Wikipedia

It is entirely written by those Chinese administrators themselves. And how can the wikipedia calls itself neutral?!

When people try to add the truth to that article, they are immediately blocked by wikipedia Obsessive-compulsive disorder administrators.

Those OCD patients even delete people’s comments on discussion page.

wikipedia simply can’t handle the truth, they don’t want people to know the truth, either. No one can trust wikipedia at all.


Another typical OCD, internet addiction wikipedia “editor” AuburnPilot exposed.

May 10, 2007

This is so easy. Just pick a random wikipedia “editor,” check out his or her’s daily “contribution,” you will be amazed how many hours they spend on that site.

Here is another one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=AuburnPilot

user name: auburnpilot.

he started on May 9th, 2007
03:20 – 07:05

about 3 hours and 45 minutes

then once again, he is back on
14:43 – 16:54

about 2 hours 11 minutes

again

20:48 – 22:14

about 1 hour 26 minutes

He spent total of 7 hours and 24 minutes in just ONE single day!

Once again, does this person have a real life job? does this person have a social life? Are those editors all nerds, social rejects, so they can only get on wikipedia to waste their entire life away? That is just pathetic. Get a life.


Wikipedia refues to admit that it is creating more OCD patients.

May 6, 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:HOLIC

Wikipedia:Wikipediholic

“This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any remotely serious purpose.”

check that out, they claim that it is not for “any remotely serious purpose.”

hello, why do they still want to hide their heads in their butts? There are so many wikipedia administrators that have obsessive compulsive disorders on there, they have no real jobs. They are on that site 24/7. They spend most of their time reverting “vandalism” which are the things that they don’t like personally.

If they are really doing a “good” job, how come there are so many false, fake biographies on that site, and how come many colleges now prohibit their students to quote from that shitty site?

It just amazes me that so many administrators obviously have no social life. And more and more OCD patients are becoming wikipedia administrators. They become administrators not by editing articles, most of them become administrators by reverting “vandalism.” They should just stop calling the site as the free “encyclopedia,” they should call it free “vandalism.”

Obviously, those OCD patients who are running that site get a natural high by reverting editions, and banning people.

They are all OCD nerds in real life, on that site, they can finally live a life as if they are all heros. duh. get a life already, go find a real hobby, losers.