Wikipedia is obsessed with penis, free erect penis pictures for everyone to see!

It seems that wikipedia has a fascination with penis! yes, that is right. It is really free pornography for everyone! There is no age requirement, as long as the kids know how to type the word penis on that page, they will be able to see plenty of real life pictures of penis soft and erect! Can you imagine if those pictures were shown on TV or magazines, or textbooks, angry parents will certainly file plenty of lawsuits against whoever did that. But on wikipedia, it is open for early sex education.

Not so long ago, it even had a real picture a elephant penis! You sure can’t find that anywhere else.

Thanks to the wonderful free donors, the penis page has had plenty of free pornography pictures.

They seem to constantly update those free porn pictures almost weekly. Parents, don’t worry, wikipedia is claimed be kid-safe, what your kids can’t find on those locked sites, they can find plenty on wikipedia. I am sure that those very dedicated OCD administrators have spent a lot of time on choosing which penis pictures to be published, which erected penis pictures will be more approriate for the children. There are plenty of penis pictures, just click on history and find more. Here are some sample pictures for the whole world to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=190018404
Two new fully erected penis pictures

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=164889591
Three different fully erected real penis pictures, plus one penis with piercing

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=136875061
Two different penis pictures in color, and same black and white penis picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=123112225
One picture of a penis soft and erect, black and white penis picture, and a ampallang pierced penis (somehow, this picture didn’t last long.)

You can also find plenty free porn pictures on other related subjects, such as vagina.

Free porns by anyone, and for everyone, that is the essence of wikipedia!

The fundamental serious problem of wikipedia – Banned for lifetime.

It is quite common that someone who only wants to contribute some valuable information on wikipedia, accidently s/he pissed off one of the OCD administrators. That person is banned for lifetime.

Are those banned editors “criminals?” Did they kill someone, or are they the internet terrorists? What did they do that deserve a lifetime ban?

Once that person is banned, anything s/he edits will be be reverted by those wikipedia OCD administrators. And that is the fundamental problem of wikipedia. Because there are just way too many OCD patients working for wikipedia who have nothing else better to do, those nerdy no-life losers spend their lifetime on reverting banned editors’ edited articles, even if they are reverting back to the vandalized page.

Here is the perfect example, what those OCD patients are doing for wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Penwhale&oldid=106705031#Hey.2C_thanks_for_reporting_me_ASSHOLE.21.21.21

They don’t care what the banned users did, they just want to revert, revert. And wikipedia foundation encourages such abusive behavior. It also gives those people a sense of power which they don’t have in real life. Further, it makes them feel good because they can’t control anyone in real life, at least they are happy that they can just abuse anyone that they dislike on wikipedia. And that is the reason why they are diagnosed as patients of obsessive-compulsive disorders.

If wikipedia doesn’t change that stupid rule, wikipedia is simply creating more and more people with wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

In real life, if someone committed a murder, s/he has to go through trials; and if s/he doesn’t agree with the judge, s/he can still go for another trial at a higher court. On wikipedia, once a person is banned by any of those OCD administrators, the person is banned for life. There is no trial, nothing. That creates lots of problems, because how can we be sure the banned user was actually “vandalizing” pages? How can we be sure that those OCD administrators actually did the right thing? There is no check and balance inside wikipedia, those OCD patients basically just bound with each other. To those idiots, they think that the world only has two kinds of people, the wikipedia administrators and those banned editors of wikipedia.

Lots of those OCD administrators are spending their time pissing people off by reverting, and they spend way too much time on studying if one of the editors is a banned editor. It gets them excited to know that a banned user is back. That is the reason why there are so many pages on wikipedia full of “criminal” names, those OCD patients are constantly adding more information about any “vandals” recent activities.

wikipedia idiots need to stop this stupid rule of banning people for lifetime, because most people were banned for the wrong reason. And even those real life criminals are given second chances once they are released from the jail. Further, many banned editors are actually well educated, and they are only trying to contribute their own knowledge. For people who have a life, they don’t have time to be wikipedia administrators, they only have time to edit a few articles once in a while.

On the other hand, many of those OCD administrators are the ones who need to be banned for lifetime, because they have no life other than wikipedia!

wikipedia’s extended porngraphic article on “Oral sex in islamic law”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_sex_in_Islamic_law

check it out, who would have imaged an article name like that?! islamic law and oral sex?! what is next? anal sex with the pope?

Indeed, it is quite clear that wikipedia has many pornographic pictures, and articles, it is practically a free pornographic sex site for all the horny teenagers who have no money to pay for those sex sites, all children are welcome to check out the wonderful pornographic world of wikipedia, full of sex, free sex for all, no age limiatation at all.

Some libraries blocked some adult sites, well, welcome to browse wikipedia, even if you are under 18 or homeless, wikipedia is not blocked on any library computers.