Wikipedia is ran by bunch of clueless clowns.

March 6, 2008

I often wonder if wikipedia is ran by mentally challenged people? This one is proven to be true. Here is a perfect example.

let’s look at this OCD wikipedia administrator, “Can’t sleep, clown will eat me”, yes, that is his/her real user name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Can’t_sleep%2C_clown_will_eat_me

A clown picture was posted, it is probably himself/herself. Under the picture, it has “AHHHH IT’S GOING TO EEEAAAAT MEEE!!!!!! “

Will any serious encyclopedia company ever hire a ridiculous clown looking like a clown to be their administrator or editor? Can this person dress like a clown if he works for microsoft or google? Certainly not. So you know the quality wikipedia has.

Check out all those ridiculous wikipedia stars s/he got. It seems that wikipedia’s mentality is really only at elementary school level, those OCD administrators constantly give each other stars as if they are still in elementary schools. Wikipedia itself is a giant elementary school while obsessed with pornography.

check out those ridiculous names of those stars this clown has got.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar (meaning: pissed off lots of good editors by reverting their good contributions)
The Working Man’s Barnstar (meaning: people who are not working in real life who spend all their time as jobless wikipedia administrators)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (meaning: obsessed with wikipedia, with no real life job, spent most of free time on here)
The Barnstar of Good Humor (Is wikipedia a comedy club? now we know why we can’t take it seriously.)
The Surreal Barnstar (meaning: they spend nighttime on wikipedia as daytime, and daytime for sleeping.)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar (meaning: adamantly refuse to seek counseling for wikipedia generated OCD)
The Purple Star
The Original Barnstar
The Barnstar of Diligence
The Excellent Userpage Award
The Special Barnstar

They obviously have no imaginiation, that is why they ran out of names, that is why they have to name two stars as “original barnstar” and “special barnstar”.

So next time, when you see someone has some stars on his/her page, that means s/he is addicted. S/he must have spent a lot of time working as OCD administrators, and has pissed a lot of real editors in order to get those meaningless stars.


Wikipedia is obsessed with penis, free erect penis pictures for everyone to see!

March 6, 2008

It seems that wikipedia has a fascination with penis! yes, that is right. It is really free pornography for everyone! There is no age requirement, as long as the kids know how to type the word penis on that page, they will be able to see plenty of real life pictures of penis soft and erect! Can you imagine if those pictures were shown on TV or magazines, or textbooks, angry parents will certainly file plenty of lawsuits against whoever did that. But on wikipedia, it is open for early sex education.

Not so long ago, it even had a real picture a elephant penis! You sure can’t find that anywhere else.

Thanks to the wonderful free donors, the penis page has had plenty of free pornography pictures.

They seem to constantly update those free porn pictures almost weekly. Parents, don’t worry, wikipedia is claimed be kid-safe, what your kids can’t find on those locked sites, they can find plenty on wikipedia. I am sure that those very dedicated OCD administrators have spent a lot of time on choosing which penis pictures to be published, which erected penis pictures will be more approriate for the children. There are plenty of penis pictures, just click on history and find more. Here are some sample pictures for the whole world to see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=190018404
Two new fully erected penis pictures

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=164889591
Three different fully erected real penis pictures, plus one penis with piercing

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=136875061
Two different penis pictures in color, and same black and white penis picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penis&oldid=123112225
One picture of a penis soft and erect, black and white penis picture, and a ampallang pierced penis (somehow, this picture didn’t last long.)

You can also find plenty free porn pictures on other related subjects, such as vagina.

Free porns by anyone, and for everyone, that is the essence of wikipedia!


Wikipedia is officially full of errors. No one should use it any more.

March 6, 2008

Who else is using wikipedia as reference these days, hardly anyone. Now it is just a site where losers and OCD administrators have crazy times together. Each day, it creates more and more wikipedia administrators with Obsessive-compulsive disorder. It is running 24 hours a day, so they feel the need to get on there as often as they can. Seriously, if they are so devoted, why don’t they quit their minimum wage jobs and go to africa, and help those people there? That is much better than wasting electricity and causing more ozone damage to the earth.

As it attracts more and more OCD patients, that site’s quality is deteriorating fast! There is probably no courts will use anything people find on wikipedia as solid evidence now.

For example, check out the phrase “mammillary body”, the function

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammillary_body 

9 October 2007, “Function is unknown; may be involved in memory.”
15 October 2007, “Relay station for the reflexes related to the sense of smell.”
26 November 2007, “They are involved with the processing of recognition memory,”

In such a short time, there were three different answers. Neuroscience is not a new subject that just appeared yesterday. Whatever mammillary body’s function is, you should be able to find it in a real neuroscience book. Did the neuroscientists just make a big discovery on October 15th, that is why its function changed from unknown to “sense of smell?!” Then did some genius discover the real function on November 26th, so its function changed to recognition memory?!

Its function was officially “related to sense of smell” for more than 40 days on wikipedia. Didn’t those OCD administrators claim that wikipedia is as accurate as those real encyclopedias, since they spend 24 hours a day on it? Where are the experts that are editing wikipedia? mm, guess they all got pissed off or banned by those Obsessive-compulsive disorder administrators. Only people who know nothing about neuroscience are editing those serious scientific articles. You, too, can make an important discovery now, if you go change its function to “male erection”. Certainly, there is no requirement for educational background check, a six-year-old kid can edit this article if s/he wants to.

What if you were using wikipedia for your serious academic study or exam, use it to write a serious academic paper, then you are screwed.

That is the reason why no one is using it for serious reference any more, because you never know the thing you read on there is correct or wrong. So next time, save yourself some time, read something else other than wikipedia for reference.


wow, those OCD wikipedia administrators/patients really have nothing else better to do.

February 18, 2008

I just found out that they even have discussion pages for those no-life losers to discuss about the randomly banned users. They can talk about whether those banned users are coming back with new user names, IP, which articles they are editing, etc. No wonder wikipedia is causing so many OCD wiki administrators, those OCD patients really can spend many hours on that.

As I have said before, no editor is a criminal, they got banned by those OCD wikipedia administrators very randomly. Those editors never got a chance to defend for themselves, those OCD wikipedia patients just like to abuse their powers to ban anyone they don’t like, there is no trial or panel meetings, etc.

Those OCD wikipedia administrator-losers have that fake sense of power. In real life, if one wants to become a judge, s/he has to go through many years of training and education. Even for a person who wants to become a police officer, s/he has to go through many hours of training. With all of that, those people will be judted by certain laws, and if they did anything wrong, there are laws to judge them. However, on wikipedia, there is no training, or laws. Those OCD losers claim themselves to be the laws and the rulers of that crazy kingdom. There is no training sessions for anyone who wants to become another OCD administrators. As long as they are obessed with that site, and have no real job in real life, they are most likely to be accepted. And there is no appeal process for any of the banned editors, once they are banned, they are banned forever, even if they are Einstein!

Are those banned users hard core criminals? Certainly not, many started with a good intention to help to edit those articles, to contribute their knowledge. On the way of doing that, they unfortunately attracted those OCD administrators, eventually they got banned for no good reasons at all. That certainly make those OCD patients happier, because now they have more people to discuss, to “investigate,” those OCD lives can only get better if they can ban more editors.

It is just really funny to see those OCD losers to add every suspicious article or IP to those banned users’ pages, as if they are helping FBI to fight some real life crimes or something. After all, there is nothing wrong if a person just want to edit an article. No one cares to read those pages other than the OCD wikipedia administrators who have no life in real life.

The wikipedia OCD losers must have a lot of fun, because they are nobody in real life, now they can “contribute” their boring lifetime for an “important” project. Most of them are not really editing articles, they are just there to piss people off.

It must give those OCD nerds great pleasure by spending hours and hours, trying to figure out if a certain IP address is used by a banned user, or if a new name or a new article edition is from one of the banned users. And there are plenty of discussion pages for those losers to discuss, they will literally crash if one day wikipedia stops functioning.

What will those losers do then? All of sudden, those losers will have total mental breakdown for sure. Then the government has to hire free psychologists for those losers, because most of those losers can’t afford to pay for counseling which they really badly need even right now!

They are reading every article on here,but it must piss them off, because they can’t delete any of them by calling them “vandalism”, they can’t ban this account, either. They certainly wish that they can take over every sites that are against wikipedia, but they have no money to buy any of them, ’cause most of the OCD patients can not contribute any money, the only thing they can contribute to wikipedai is their entire boring lives.

More and more places, such as universities, colleges, news media, etc, are banning their people using wikipedia now. It is a matter of fact before the world realizes that wikipedia is nothing but a site full of OCD nerds.


How to act like a professional on wikipedia?

January 7, 2008

We all know there are plenty OCD patients that are managing the wikipedia site, they constantly piss people off by reverting and deleting other people’s contribution.

So how can you fight back? This is quite easy, just act like one of them, here is how.

1. When you want to revert what those idiots deleted, do not use your regular user name on there, always use an annoymous IP address.

2. Always enter the following on “Edit summary”, you can enter all, or just one or two: “personal attack, POV, unsourced POV, revert vandalism, revert repeated vandalism.”

3. If they give you a warning, ask you to stop “vandalizing” the articles, this is also easy to do. First, you ignore their warning. Second, you should just copy whatever they wrote to you without their signature part, and paste that to their discussion page, and be sure to sign with your own user name or IP.

That way you will make those OCD patients look bad, and make your own edition the correct one, because after all, they are vandalizing the page, and you are doing good things by reverting them back.


The fundamental serious problem of wikipedia – Banned for lifetime.

October 19, 2007

It is quite common that someone who only wants to contribute some valuable information on wikipedia, accidently s/he pissed off one of the OCD administrators. That person is banned for lifetime.

Are those banned editors “criminals?” Did they kill someone, or are they the internet terrorists? What did they do that deserve a lifetime ban?

Once that person is banned, anything s/he edits will be be reverted by those wikipedia OCD administrators. And that is the fundamental problem of wikipedia. Because there are just way too many OCD patients working for wikipedia who have nothing else better to do, those nerdy no-life losers spend their lifetime on reverting banned editors’ edited articles, even if they are reverting back to the vandalized page.

Here is the perfect example, what those OCD patients are doing for wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Penwhale&oldid=106705031#Hey.2C_thanks_for_reporting_me_ASSHOLE.21.21.21

They don’t care what the banned users did, they just want to revert, revert. And wikipedia foundation encourages such abusive behavior. It also gives those people a sense of power which they don’t have in real life. Further, it makes them feel good because they can’t control anyone in real life, at least they are happy that they can just abuse anyone that they dislike on wikipedia. And that is the reason why they are diagnosed as patients of obsessive-compulsive disorders.

If wikipedia doesn’t change that stupid rule, wikipedia is simply creating more and more people with wikipedia addiction and wikipedia generated OCD.

In real life, if someone committed a murder, s/he has to go through trials; and if s/he doesn’t agree with the judge, s/he can still go for another trial at a higher court. On wikipedia, once a person is banned by any of those OCD administrators, the person is banned for life. There is no trial, nothing. That creates lots of problems, because how can we be sure the banned user was actually “vandalizing” pages? How can we be sure that those OCD administrators actually did the right thing? There is no check and balance inside wikipedia, those OCD patients basically just bound with each other. To those idiots, they think that the world only has two kinds of people, the wikipedia administrators and those banned editors of wikipedia.

Lots of those OCD administrators are spending their time pissing people off by reverting, and they spend way too much time on studying if one of the editors is a banned editor. It gets them excited to know that a banned user is back. That is the reason why there are so many pages on wikipedia full of “criminal” names, those OCD patients are constantly adding more information about any “vandals” recent activities.

wikipedia idiots need to stop this stupid rule of banning people for lifetime, because most people were banned for the wrong reason. And even those real life criminals are given second chances once they are released from the jail. Further, many banned editors are actually well educated, and they are only trying to contribute their own knowledge. For people who have a life, they don’t have time to be wikipedia administrators, they only have time to edit a few articles once in a while.

On the other hand, many of those OCD administrators are the ones who need to be banned for lifetime, because they have no life other than wikipedia!


Simple ways to avoid Obsessive-compulsive wikipedia administrators.

August 28, 2007

There are just tons and tons of wikipedia administrators who have OCD – obsessive compulsive disorder, some may have the disorder, some may have the OCD personality which is quite different than the disorder.

Anyway, in case you don’t know, once an OCD administrator is hooked on you, anything you write or edit, s/he will constantly watch you. That could cause a lot of problems, because those OCD administrators have the power to ban you, revert anything you edit, and they will call anything you write or edit as “vandalism,” revert them or delete them. And there is nothing you can do about it. And sometimes they will even go crazy, they will simply protect the article that you edit, so no one can write anything even if it is a vandalized version.

So here are some simple things to avoid those OCD patients.

Ideally, you have a dynamic IP internet connection. www.whatismyip.com, it will show your ip address, if it remains the same every time you get on the internet even after you turn off the modem, that means you don’t have dynamic IP.

1. You should edit articles without signing on a wikipedia account, so when those OCD administrators click on you IP and they can only find out all the articles that you edited on that particular day. That way, they won’t be able to revert everything you have ever edited. They can only revert the articles that you have edited with that particular IP.

Also it is hard for them to remember all the digits in the IP address, therefore, it would be hard for them to talk among other OCD administrators. Can you image them talking like this “so 280.283.28.0 is back again,” the other one will say, “oh, yea 280.283.28.2 could be the same person.”

You just don’t know what those OCD patients are capable of, when they are in the OCD mood, they will just revert everything, literally everything. Even if that means they will have to spend hours on doing that, after all, wikipedia is their social life. It doesn’t matter to them if they reverted the vandalized version or not, when they have gone crazy, they just want to release their compulsive disorder.

2. You should sign on a new account, only when you want to create a new article. And try not to use any actual words in your user name, so the OCD administrators will have a hard time to remember them.

You should never enter your email when you sign on a new account, you don’t know what they will do with your email, and with that email, they can probably search it online, and find out all the things that you have done online.

3. When you create new articles, don’t use the same user ID over and over. Create a new account after you have created a few new articles. So those OCD administrators won’t be able to track all the articles you have done, so they can’t revert everything.

There is no need to feel bad about creating new accounts, because those OCD administrators do that all the time. They have those fake accounts that are used only to piss off certain people. So when you check out the contribution lists, you will find out that those accounts have minimal activities. So you see, there is no need to feel bad about what you are doing, wikipedia has way too many OCD administrators with double, triple, even numerous accounts.

4. Try to edit any articles only once. Don’t edit, save, edit and save many times all in one day. That attracts OCD administrators. If they don’t like what they see, they will revert the article all the way back to where you started, call anything you wrote as “vandalism”, even if the thing that they reverted are the actual vandalized version. That is very typical for all the OCD administrators.

5. If unfortunately, an OCD administrators got hooked on you and the articles that you edited, just let them do whatever that satisfy their compulsions. You should just remember that article name, and wait it for a month or two. By then, the OCD administrators will find some new obsessions to deal with, and then you can come back and do whatever you want with that article. Be sure to use a new account only for that particular article that you want to edit.

6.For people who don’t have dynamic IP, one thing that you can do is to only edit articles when you are sign on with a wikipedia account. Because if you have pissed off one of the OCD administrators, they will simply ban your IP. And from then on, you won’t be able to do anything unless you change your internet provider or move to a new place with a new internet connection, or use a proxy which is a little complicated to write it in this article. Be sure to get a new user name after a while, so your entire history won’t be exposed. Because some crazy OCD administrators will actually study your entire log history, and can revert everything that you have ever written!

7. Don’t try to edit one article all at once. That way, you can avoid OCD administrators’ attention. Edit something, then wait till someone else add their things in there. That means your edition is now confirmed, then you can write something new.

8. At last, if those crazy OCD administrators actually lock the articles that you want to edit, don’t worry. Wait for a few days, then create a new account. Use a different name for that article. For example, if the original article name is “Suzy’s doll,” you can create a new article called “Doll of Suzy,” or “Suzy’s only doll,” etc. Most of the time, even if you just add a single comma, period, or some capital letters, wikipedia’s computers will consider them as new articles. Simply copy whatever you wrote in the original article, and save it. There you go, mission is accomplished. let those crazy administrators watch those original articles like some silly dogs that they are. Now your version of article is published for the whole world to see.

Be sure never to use that account again. Create another account to add another new article. So those wikipedia OCD patients won’t go after you like maniacs.

Those OCD patients are not there to edit articles, they are just there to piss people off. They would rather delete anything useful than keeping the useful things that you wrote. They get enormously “happy” when they “detect” anything “unusual” over any articles that they have been “watching.” That means they can abuse their power again. So sometimes the best way is to avoid those patients all together, just create the same article with another new name. simple and easy.


Another typical OCD, internet addiction wikipedia “editor” AuburnPilot exposed.

May 10, 2007

This is so easy. Just pick a random wikipedia “editor,” check out his or her’s daily “contribution,” you will be amazed how many hours they spend on that site.

Here is another one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=AuburnPilot

user name: auburnpilot.

he started on May 9th, 2007
03:20 – 07:05

about 3 hours and 45 minutes

then once again, he is back on
14:43 – 16:54

about 2 hours 11 minutes

again

20:48 – 22:14

about 1 hour 26 minutes

He spent total of 7 hours and 24 minutes in just ONE single day!

Once again, does this person have a real life job? does this person have a social life? Are those editors all nerds, social rejects, so they can only get on wikipedia to waste their entire life away? That is just pathetic. Get a life.


Wikipedia refues to admit that it is creating more OCD patients.

May 6, 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:HOLIC

Wikipedia:Wikipediholic

“This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any remotely serious purpose.”

check that out, they claim that it is not for “any remotely serious purpose.”

hello, why do they still want to hide their heads in their butts? There are so many wikipedia administrators that have obsessive compulsive disorders on there, they have no real jobs. They are on that site 24/7. They spend most of their time reverting “vandalism” which are the things that they don’t like personally.

If they are really doing a “good” job, how come there are so many false, fake biographies on that site, and how come many colleges now prohibit their students to quote from that shitty site?

It just amazes me that so many administrators obviously have no social life. And more and more OCD patients are becoming wikipedia administrators. They become administrators not by editing articles, most of them become administrators by reverting “vandalism.” They should just stop calling the site as the free “encyclopedia,” they should call it free “vandalism.”

Obviously, those OCD patients who are running that site get a natural high by reverting editions, and banning people.

They are all OCD nerds in real life, on that site, they can finally live a life as if they are all heros. duh. get a life already, go find a real hobby, losers.


Wikipedia banned, a giant step for mankind.

April 11, 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/education/21wikipedia.html?ex=1329714000&en=156f770bd93c4fa0&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

From “New York Times”, by Noam Cohen, published on February 21st, 2007

“He figured out the problem soon enough. The obscure, though incorrect, information was from Wikipedia, the collaborative online encyclopedia, and the students had picked it up cramming for his exam.”

” the Middlebury history department notified its students this month that Wikipedia could not be cited in papers or exams, and that students could not “point to Wikipedia or any similar source that may appear in the future to escape the consequences of errors.”

“Wikipedia articles, written by hundreds of volunteers and subject to mistakes and sometimes deliberate falsehoods. Wikipedia itself has restricted the editing of some subjects, mostly because of repeated vandalism or disputes over what should be said.”

Of course, that site has full of errors. And many times, the articles have nothing, but personal opinions disguised as real “knowledge.”

Wikipedia is not forever, it has to rely on computer hardwares and electricity. However, it is causing more and more people lured into the endless editing wars, and more and more people are getting the obsessive-compulsive disorders because of the existence of wikipedia.

If wikipedia is banned, then there won’t be so many new OCD patients popping up everyday. If wikipedia is banned, all those millions of people around the world will be able to be forced to give up their useless editing hobby, and be able to use those free time for some real social life fun.

One small step for the history department, one giant step for mankind indeed.