Wikipedia is a junk site edited by a selected few biased anonymous editors with multiple screen names. It doesn’t allow free editing as it claims and it’s now coasting on being so underfinanced its on a going-out-of-business sale. It’s been forever going out of business because no one donates money to it anymore, because no one reads it anymore because the junk on it is censored, biased, engineered and criminal. Its basically now a California-officed tax write-off that caters to the media-entertainment industry junk that traffics through New York-Los Angeles. Jimmy Wales is an unemployed criminal goon and a life dropout, and that’s a REAL FACT. Wikipedia is on such a vertical dive it makes MySpace and Twitter look like a rocket launch. It needs to get sued and BUSTED until its closed for good, once and for all. Good riddance, Wikipedia. We NEVER loved you anyway. NEVER get your information from Wikipedia. Get your information from research like most who seek information have to, or at least start your own Wiki that does it for real.

It is offered “free”, everyone “contributes”, everyone “controls”. Everyone around the world can rule this site, every single wikipedia admin works independently without the need for help from anyone else! If that is not pure communism, what is it? Wikipedia based their web site idea on the principles of the communism!

While the communism around the globe is going downhill, wikipedia is still breathing. It gives great satisfaction to those uneducated, low-life communism admins something to do at home, but it will never be a great site.

It asks the rich to send money to build this site, so the poor who can not pay for those serious encyclopedia, can only read those wikipedia articles online for free. That is the same idea of communism, rob the rich to feed the poor.

Wikipedia is controlled by communism dictators, no one can say anything bad about wikipedia unless what s/he contributed are already published in newspapers, magazines, etc. Since wikipedia can’t ban those published articles, then they have no choice but to publish them on their own site. However, they can still delete the contributor’s content based on the claim of “vandalism” or “copyrights violation”.

No one can write or copy any bad things about wikipedia from his/her own perspective or blogs on wikipedia, because “personal opinions” can not be used as “encyclopedia” articles. Even if you are Einstein, if what you wrote is not published somewhere, it can’t be approved.

Every article has to be approved by wikipedia admins, anyone who read those articles is getting brainwashed by them. An innocent reader may read an article on the site saying that A is good, B is bad. S/he didn’t know that the bad things about A did not get approved by wikipedia dictating admins, therefore, s/he just got brainwashed.  Another example, suppose that a tribe in the jungle started their own language wikipedia, those are the only people who can understand the language. Of course, what they wrote on wikipedia reflex what they believe, it doesn’t matter what they wrote is the truth or not.

That is why no reputable media will quote anything from wikipedia, because everyone knows wikipedia is nothing, but full of horse manure.

Just like those real world communism leaders, most of them are uneducated. It is the same thing on wikipedia, they think that anyone can be a wikipedia admin. They never ask for the age, the education, etc, as long as the person is addicted to wikipedia, who has no real jobs, who has no social life, who can sit in front of the computer all day, who is committed to spend the rest of his/her life for wikipedia free of charge, that person can be a communism dictator admin for wikipedia. simple as that! The only people who can apply for the admin positions are the ones that are already proved by dictators at wikipedia. Unlike in a democratic country, wikipedia admins are only selected by dicators of wikipedia. People have no rights. Communism rules on wikipedia!

Of course, the common people can vote for those approved future admins. Who are the common people? Anyone who disagrees with wikipedia dicatorship is already banned by the communists at wikipedia, there is no appeal or trial. They of course have no voting rights. The ones who can vote are the ones who still support the communist idea of wikipedia. So in the end, communists are voting for communists. The cycle just keeps going.

Once the person becomes an admin, s/he immediately can get connected to other comrades around the country and across the world. Each one of them is given the full dictatorship on wikipedia. S/he have full rights to decide to revert, delete anything s/he doesn’t like. S/he can ban any user, put any articles under protection so no one can edit it. There is no laws, rules for those crazy communism admins to follow as long as they can quote something from the “rules of wikipedia”. The most common word they use is “vandalism”. It doesn’t matter what you wrote in the article, if they don’t like you, they will call anything you wrote “vandalism”. No one can argue with them once they quote the “laws” of the Communism wikipedia. So every wikipedia admin is 100% dictator. The admins don’t have to be experts on anything as long as they obey their superior’s orders.

So wikipedia is indeed a communist heaven.

After all, won’t that be a great idea if they publish those “accurate” articles, and send those hard copies to schools in poor countries who can’t afford to buy computers to get online?

Why no serious web sites, magazines, newspapers, colleges, universities ever use wikipedia for references?

The fact says it all. Wikipedia is nothing, but a site for lunatics, jobless losers who have nothing better to do, but to “devote” their life for a meaningless web site.

If you write something in wikipedia articles, they will reverse it, and tell you that you didn’t give any reference. Therefore, they can’t accept it.

But if you give some references, and write something in the article, then they will reverse it again. This time, they claim that you violated copyrights. Therefore, what you wrote is still not acceptable.

Most of the time, it is the same wikipedia OCD admins who reverse those same articles. They are really obsessed with those articles as if those things are their own children.

And if you try to edit those articles again, then those wikipedia ocd idiotic admins will automatically put those articles under “protection” from “vandalism”.

There are really no rules, no boundaries, no limitations what those admins can do. Each one of them is a dictator. If they don’t like what you wrote, they will reverse it, call it a vandalism, then put the article under “protection”. And you can’t even argue with those idiots, because they will delete your discussion on their own “discussion” pages.

It is really absurd that those OCD admin losers devote their entire life for this idiotic web site. Get a job already!

You are so right ! Wikipedia is run by a bunch of losers, who have no work in real life than to sit and edit articles on wikipedia. No wonder, the site stinks cos of the rotten things written that. And most importantly, its not even true…. anybody writing the truth as verified by real facts, can get their entries deleted cos of the crappy moods of wikipedia so-claimed self-appointed experts.
Well, experts they certainly are, but experts at hiding the truth and publishing what they feel like publishing. Also , they never really grew up… so they sit and block anyone and everyone without any rhyme or reason.. just like how kids would not like to play with others who can make them lose in a game.
AT B-SCHOOLs, in fact, students are told NOT to refer to wikipedia cos they have no iota of truth in them. Wikipedia references are not accepted in academic essays and papers.
Goes on to prove that wikipedia is for the truly idle, hypocrites, and loser people in the world.

However, it is very simple and easy to make that site an actual trustworthy encyclopedia.

First of all, get rid of all those free amateur administrators who clearly have OCD.

Second, start advertising on their web site, then they can make some money, not for profit, but to use those money to hire professionals.

Third, once they get the money, they can start hiring some real professors, people who are professional in all those particular subjects. For example, they can go to colleges, pay a little money to those college biology professors, ask them to take their time to proofread or edit all those biological articles. They don’t even have to hire any ivy league college professors. Regular college professors should be sufficient. By doing so, those professors can be paid for a little amount of money. Those money can’t make those professors rich, but it is a good way to compensate them for their good efforts.

Forth, ordinary people can still edit, but their editions have to be proved by professional people. And their names will be published to show that they stand by what they have proofread. And they will write out their professional opinion why particular editions were not proved. Therefore, they won’t be any arguments.

Currently idiots at wikipedia are constantly asking people for money, it is just a waste of money to give them any money. Because you are just donating money for OCD idiots who have no real life jobs, who like to “volunteer” to manage wikipedia, who like to waste their lives away on that stupid site.

just check out the word “masturbation”, then click on the left pane to see the same article in many other languages, you will be surprised to see all those dirty pictures that they have uploaded to wikipedia. The French version even had a animated picture of a guy playing with his tool. Some language sites have pictures of guys sucking themselves, (autofellation).

http://ta.wikipedia.org has a animated picture which a guy is masturbating non-stop.

the dirtiest site among all is the http://te.wikipedia.org site, it has several sex pictures of people doing it to each other.

(In the future, they probably will allow people to upload their own masturbation videos. ) After I wrote this sentence, I actually already found one masturbating video on the German language site, another one on the site id.wikipedia.org.

It doesn’t matter if you are straight, gay, male or female, you will be happy to see too large size, high definition pictures of one female, one male masturbating.

I am sure that those two person who posted their own pictures are exhibitionists. They can’t post those pictures on any other “public” sites, but they are doing this for “science.”

Once again, if you want free pornography, wikipedia should be your top choice!

Yes, that is what happening more frequently now. Wikipedia is becoming more retarded than ever before!

They used to keep everyone’s edit on file even if they got reverted back. Now it seems that they actually have the ability to delete everything that you have edited since day one! That is right, if those retards think that you have put something that they don’t like, what they will do now is to actually delete everything you wrote! so when you check the history of that particular article, all your time got wasted, because they deleted them all!

Those retards can claim that you have violated the copyrighted materials even if you clearly did NOT violate anything. They delete everything! So if you don’t save your own edition, all your hard work will be gone forever!

For anyone who is new to this retarded site, you could have wasted hours of word in an instant second. Those retarded OCD administrators don’t have to consult anyone, they can just do whatever they like now! There is simply no balance and check on that site.

Now why do they want to do that? Of course, they just enjoy to piss off more people, that is what those retards do at wikipedia.

After all, unless what you wrote  is too out of the ordinary, I don’t see a reason they have the need to delete anything you wrote even if yours “violated” any copyrights. After all, they already “reverted”. And who do they think that they are? They are not god, who gave them the rights to delete anyone’s editions?

Most retarded of all is that those retarded OCD wikipedia administrators still like to do the old dirty trick. They will claim because this particular article is being vandalized, therefore, it is put  under semi or full protection until one month later, so only people who have edited more than 50 times can edit those articles. Who has time to edit a retarded web sites more than 50 times? Do you think that president, the doctors, the scientists actually have time the sit there and edit a retarded web site all the time?

Who is actually going to remember this retarded site, and come back to contribute again? I don’t think so.

No wonder wikipedia is going downhill. It will never be as big as before. That is just the fact.

you don’t have to understand english at all, just look at those dirty pictures they posted on the site.  Posting one picture is fine, do they really have to show you so many different pictures of the same thing so many times, shaved, with pubic hair, even with a picture of when a woman was sexually aroused?!

parents, do you want your children to look at dirty pictures like that? ! If your children are not allowed to watch R rated movies, why should they be given the freedom to look at those dirty pictures which R rated movies won’t even show? It is about time for all public schools to ban dirty porn sites like this!